safety

The scariest part of this is that Anthropic showed some restraint in not releasing a potentially dangerous technology but some of their competitors (such as OpenAI and xAI) might well not. Whether Myt

this is interesting. 1. Did Anthropic forget to run a control? 2. Where does this leave us? New post: We tested the Mythos showcase vulnerabilities with open models. They recovered similar scoped anal

To anyone who read Rebooting AI back in (checks notes) 2019, this is both hilarious and unsuprising. The field has wasted 7 years on an architecture that can’t solve one of the most basic litmus tests

AI critic Gary Marcus uses the irony of ChatGPT's Voice mode being unable to perform a basic task — starting a timer — as a pointed illustration of the gap between AI industry hype and real-world c...

Want more proof that Anthropic's PR has no idea what it's talking about? The talk of Mythos being 'their most aligned model ever'. They could perhaps truthfully speak about 'new high scores on our ali

What Should We Take From Anthropic’s (possibly) Terrifying New Report on Mythos? – ⁦@garymarcus’s latest @CACMmag⁩ https://cacm.acm.org/blogcacm/what-should-we-take-from-anthropics-possibly-terrifying

If you ban self-driving cars to protect the taxi union, you have blood on your hands If you want to know why @Waymo is no longer testing in NYC, this statement says it all: “Our top priority for AV te

Anthropic's Frontier Red Team published a technical report (April 2026) detailing how their unreleased model, Claude Mythos Preview, autonomously identifies and exploits critical security vulnerabi...