Search: “llm”

arXiv:2608.26137v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Second-language (L2) English learners can rarely rehearse speaking with a partner. Speaking is also the most anxiety-laden skill. These gaps drive a fas

arXiv:2506.14496v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Swarm intelligence describes how simple, decentralized agents can collectively produce complex behaviors. Recently, the concept of swarming has been

arXiv:2505.23022v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) serving increasingly underpins online Web services such as conversational agents, Web search, and programming assistants,

arXiv:2608.25523v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prefix caching introduces a fundamental tradeoff in multi-agent large language model (LLM) serving: retaining a long system-prompt key-value (KV) cache

arXiv:2608.24314v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating conversational voice agents at scale re- quires reliable assessment methods that capture both observ- able interaction quality and the contex

Now we know: The popular Ox Alpha LLM was GLM-5.3-Flash... Compared to GLM-5.2, this new GLM-5.3-Flash model uses: - a Kimi Linear-style 3:1 (super*) hybrid attention pattern with 34 Kimi Delta Attent

arXiv:2608.24017v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The emerging W3C WebMCP proposal enables LLM agents to invoke tools exposed by web pages. In multi-party web environments, however, integrating agent

arXiv:2608.23104v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Molecular science represents an important frontier for LLM-based agents. Unlike general agents that mainly operate over natural language, code, or web

arXiv:2608.21156v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLMs have evolved from language generators to autonomous agents capable of complex, long-horizon tasks. This evolution has produced paradigms includin

arXiv:2608.20438v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Population-level behavior in large-language-model (LLM) agents cannot be characterized by single-agent benchmarks. We introduce PV-SST, a peer-voted s

arXiv:2608.21074v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in research workflows and software development pipelines, yet their output remains sensitive to inp

arXiv:2608.20376v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents can now generate realistic shilling profiles, fluent reviews, and coherent ratings at scale, systematically defeating recommender-system defe

arXiv:2608.19746v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Personalized text generation aims to make LLMs write in a specific individual's style, yet existing benchmarks measure task accuracy or preference align

arXiv:2608.18008v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Combining large language models with reinforcement learning is increasingly explored, yet the theoretical status of LLM-derived reward signals is ofte

arXiv:2608.15893v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rise of social media bots poses a persistent threat, enabling misinformation, opinion manipulation, and the erosion of trust in online platforms. To

arXiv:2608.14370v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The modelling and analysis of secure business processes require the incorporation of security annotations into process models. Although BPMN extension

arXiv:2608.12779v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding the temporal progression of symptoms in clinical narratives is critical for disease monitoring, safety surveillance, and causality asses

arXiv:2608.11434v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mobile agent benchmarks increasingly rely on LLM-based judges to evaluate task completion, yet the reliability of these judges on mobile agent trajector

arXiv:2608.11207v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When two LLM agents with structurally opposed objectives interact across multiple turns, the absence of a shared goal function produces not competition

arXiv:2608.11215v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Simulating societies of many large language model (LLM) agents is expensive, yet the questions asked of such simulations are usually macroscopic: phase

arXiv:2508.03611v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper presents Astrolabe, a randomized prediction-guided scheduler for one-shot request dispatch in multi-instance large language model (

arXiv:2608.10698v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has increased the need for reliable detection of LLM-generated text, especially in realistic Chine

arXiv:2608.10385v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as relevance assessors in information retrieval (IR) evaluation, raising questions about how assess

Stealing Reasoning Traces from Proprietary LLM APIs A vanity domain name (stolen-thoughts.com) for a neat paper: Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google return encrypted chain-of-thought blocks to clients that

arXiv:2608.05120v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Kinetic model discovery is a central challenge in chemical engineering, as accurate rate expressions are essential for understanding and controlling che

arXiv:2608.01810v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Rubric-based LLM-as-judge pipelines often assume that evaluation criteria provide independent signals. In practice, however, criteria can be behaviorall

arXiv:2607.29167v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-term memory lets large language model(LLM) agents reuse prior preferences and work flows, but it also turns untrusted observations into persisten

arXiv:2602.16111v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Online media platforms track the share of impressions associated with content attributes, or prevalence, to evaluate trade-offs and set guardr

arXiv:2607.27389v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning-to-optimize (L2O) methods accelerate repeated optimization by training models to predict solutions, warm starts, branching decisions, or other

arXiv:2607.26072v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-term memory is becoming a core capability of LLM-based agents, but existing evaluations largely test conversational recall in open-domain or pers

arXiv:2607.27973v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recently, Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a crucial paradigm for the post-training of Large Language Model (LLM) agents. However, existing me

arXiv:2607.26317v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Psychometric calibration for educational tests typically requires costly human response data. Large language models (LLMs) simulated examinees offer a

arXiv:2607.26637v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deployed LLM agents increasingly keep their long-term memory as a filesystem: a directory tree of markdown files that the agent itself reads, writes, an

arXiv:2607.26062v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Background: This work investigates the presence of implicit bias in Large Language Model (LLM)-based chat AI models directed toward people with intell

arXiv:2607.27155v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly expected to assist users in completing tasks. However, existing benchmarks provide limited support

arXiv:2607.25880v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM provenance testing asks whether a suspect LLM belongs to the same lineage as a source. Existing black-box methods largely infer this relationship

arXiv:2607.22651v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have enabled increasingly capable conversational agents, but reliably controlling their behavior in real-time interactive e

arXiv:2607.22880v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have driven growing interest in using LLMs to automate test generation. Prior work commonly evaluates

arXiv:2505.04260v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Personalizing LLM responses typically requires users to articulate their preferences through prompting, which can be burdensome at cold start

arXiv:2607.23286v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automatic feature engineering (AutoFE) for tabular learning can be naturally formulated as a program synthesis problem, where the objective is to discov

arXiv:2607.22165v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based database agents show promise, but differing task scopes, testbeds, and metrics hinder comparison. We identify four gaps between evaluation a

No single metric proves an LLM judge is trustworthy. This field guide shows how to measure human–human agreement, compare it to LLM–human agreement, and diagnose errors with precision, recall, and F1.

arXiv:2607.12631v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in high-stakes domains, understanding contextual factors that may modul

arXiv:2607.12885v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM judges are increasingly being used to evaluate open-ended model responses, often in no-reference settings where a ground-truth answer is unavailable

arXiv:2607.12216v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-agent and memory-augmented LLM systems often place coordination content, shared state, prior discussion, tool outputs, summaries, and role instr

arXiv:2607.05682v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM systems for scientific discovery increasingly assist with ideation, literature synthesis, experiment planning, and report generation, but the first