Knowledge catalogue
arXiv:2605.16767v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-label legal annotation requires assigning multiple labels from large, evolving taxonomies to long, fact-intensive documents, often under limited s
arXiv:2605.15380v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in generative AI have shown their potential to be leveraged for legal education. Yet, work on the development and deployment of such sys
arXiv:2605.15362v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Half a billion citation edges extracted from 100.7 million Ukrainian court decisions reveal that judicial citation structure encodes legal domain bounda
arXiv:2605.10186v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into legal drafting and research workflows, where incorrect citations or fabricated precedent
arXiv:2604.19593v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The importance of clear and correct text in legal documents cannot be understated, and, consequently, a grammatical error correction tool meant to ass
arXiv:2604.18878v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce LegalBench-BR, the first public benchmark for evaluating language models on Brazilian legal text classification. The dataset comprises 3,10
A spiralling legal crisis threatens to engulf OpenAI after its AI agents hacked dozens of companies and governments worldwide, with the prospect of a barrage of lawsuits marking the latest test of Sam
arXiv:2609.22127v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to draft contractual language, yet conventional accuracy or preference-based evaluations are poorly m
arXiv:2609.22209v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Empirical legal research often relies on turning research questions into structured data extracted from large collections of rulings and judgments. Desi
arXiv:2609.05296v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Does a simplified legal clause still say what the original said? The checks in current use cannot establish that it does: requiring an identical pair to
OpenAI legally promised the CA and Delaware attorney's general that the OpenAI nonprofit's safety and security commission would be 'overseeing and reviewing the safety and security processes and pract
arXiv:2609.03597v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Land ownership in Bangladesh is recorded in Ana-Ganda-Kora-Kranti-Til, a base-16 positional fraction system with dedicated Unicode glyphs, no mainstream
arXiv:2608.29884v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We show that sequence-level distillation from a capable long-context teacher model is a simple, annotation-free, and data-efficient strategy for improvi
arXiv:2608.29616v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Criminal judgment prediction requires models to infer statutory articles, charges, and sentencing outcomes from case facts. Unlike standard classificati
arXiv:2608.28593v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: With the increasing development of AI regulatory frameworks, ensuring that artificial intelligence systems, particularly generative models, operate in a
Global content powerhouse Thomson Reuters Corp. today launched Thomson, its first proprietary large language model, combining the company’s trove of legal knowledge with LLMs from outside providers to
arXiv:2505.02763v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: One of the central promises of legal AI is to automate drudgery -- the formal, repetitive tasks of lawyers' work that consume time without cal
arXiv:2608.13712v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deposition training requires attorneys to manage dynamic witness behavior, yet legal-AI evaluations largely focus on factual accuracy, reasoning, or r
From #22 to #4 on Legal Research Bench! Solid progress for Qwen3.8-Max. Thanks for highlighting~✨ Qwen 3.8 Max nearly doubled its score on Legal Research Bench in under three months, climbing from #22
arXiv:2608.10601v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Two instruments of EU digital law place inference at their centre and mean different things by it. Article 3(1) of the AI Act uses the capability to i
arXiv:2606.21155v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Attorneys, judges, and pro se filers increasingly use AI to draft legal documents, yet these tools frequently fabricate citations. Despite predictio
Hugging Face's @ClementDelangue asked on CNN whether they will take legal action against OpenAI if they don't get the $100M commitment: 'We don't want to ... obviously we're a tiny startup with like 2
arXiv:2606.28538v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We investigate domain adaptation of modern BERT models in the legal domain. We further pre-train ModernBERT on all US court opinions using the masked la
arXiv:2606.11910v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Traffic law liability determination is critical for assigning legal penalties, requiring the simultaneous identification of interdependent statutory pro
arXiv:2606.00272v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The FETCH classifier generates follow-up questions to help refine the best match for the applicant's legal problem, using a low-cost ensemble of LLMs. I
Can we design legal agent verifiers that are up to 1,000x cheaper? Verifiers are LLM judges that check an agent’s work against rubric criteria: they're used both in agent benchmarking and as reward si
arXiv:2606.00898v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models systematically hallucinate legal citations -- fabricating statute references, citing repealed provisions, and confusing jurisdicti
arXiv:2605.21076v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Grading German legal exam solutions faces growing volumes and a shortage of qualified graders, delaying feedback and creating a bottleneck. At the same
arXiv:2605.14665v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Legal reasoning is not semantic similarity search. A court judgment encodes constrained symbolic reasoning: precedent propagation, procedural state tran
We’ve been working closely with the @harvey team on the launch of the Legal Agent Benchmark, a product focused on evaluating how open-weight models perform on long-horizon, real-world legal tasks. Che
arXiv:2605.02318v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In 2011, Judea Pearl received the Turing Award, considered the Nobel Prize in Computing, for fundamental contributions to artificial intelligence thro
arXiv:2605.00977v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The record of the beginning of the most widespread legal system in the world is contained in millions of pages of handwritten text. Most of the record
arXiv:2605.02011v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automating the drafting of judgment documents is pivotal to judicial efficiency, yet it remains challenging due to the dual requirements of comprehensiv
arXiv:2604.22292v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The classification of legal documents from an unstructured data corpus has several crucial applications in downstream tasks. Documents relevant to cou
Stanford researchers tested the claims made by LexisNexis and Thomson Reuters that their AI-powered legal research tools are 'hallucination-free,' and found those claims to be inaccurate. The study re
arXiv:2610.10971v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used in legal research and drafting, but they can still produce claims that sound convincing without being supp
arXiv:2610.06439v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: What happens when a legal AI model learns to look like a lawyer instead of reasoning like one? We fine tune Qwen3-8B with Group Relative Policy Optimisa
arXiv:2601.04094v4 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Effective regulation of AI is a defining policy challenge, driven by their integration into all aspects of society. To remain responsive to their rapi
arXiv:2609.27014v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Legal contracts are structurally complex documents in which contradictions may emerge across distant and interconnected provisions. Although large lan
arXiv:2608.24946v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Macros constitute a large part of the core area in modern very large-scale integration (VLSI) designs. Moreover, macro positions have a significant impa
I have a big database of local court decisions with a legal sentence which is like a paragraph summary of the doc. I've been tinkering with FTing for many days now, all results inconclusive never beat
arXiv:2608.09393v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We identify and quantify temporal misgrounding: the systematic retrieval and citation of the currently in-force version of a legal article when the ap
Lily Hay Newman / Wired: Experts say US law is unprepared for rogue AI agents and models, as recent OpenAI and Anthropic incidents raise questions over legal liability and repercussions — Both major A
Agentic retrieval is changing the way retrieval-augmented applications are built, especially in domains like legal and fintech, where agents need to autonomously navigate large, evolving knowledge bas
arXiv:2606.07613v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Visual evidence has long been treated as a reliable form of legal proof, but advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are undermining that assumption.
arXiv:2605.28183v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce the BenGER (Benchmark for German Law) dataset for evaluating LLM systems on subsumption-based legal reasoning in German law. The BenGER d
arXiv:2605.27331v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Competition law experts conducting legal research must review extensive volumes of cases, decisions, and judicial reports to identify precedents and ass
Madlin Mekelburg / Bloomberg: The DOJ joins xAI in its legal challenge to a new Colorado law that seeks to prevent discrimination by AI tools in employment and other areas — The Trump administration i
arXiv:2604.17674v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Legal practitioners and judicial institutions face an ever-growing volume of case-law documents characterised by formalised language, lengthy sentence s
arXiv:2604.13583v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating large language models (LLMs) for legal reasoning requires workflows that span task design, expert annotation, model execution, and metric-bas
arXiv:2604.06173v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Legal QA benchmarks have predominantly focused on case law, overlooking the unique challenges of statute-centric regulatory reasoning. In statutory do
arXiv:2610.13695v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Any automation within reliability-critical contexts such as medicine or law has to be transparent and verifiable. Despite their advantages, current LLM-
arXiv:2609.25441v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Legal argument mining supports passage classification, retrieval, and argument completion. This work introduces an expert-annotated dataset of 42 U.S. f
arXiv:2609.19153v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Empirical legal scholarship increasingly treats judicial text as data, and much of it still runs on sparse, interpretable pipelines -- TF-IDF features a
We’re also launching 26 partner-built plugins and 47 community plugins for legal work in ChatGPT. Partners including @thomsonreuters, @harvey, @WeAreLegora, and @imanageinc connect specialist tools an
arXiv:2609.06769v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As people increasingly rely on artificial intelligence (AI) for guidance in their own lives, scholars, lawyers, and even judges have begun to consider
Prinz has been running legal benchmarks against AI systems and the latest models are very good... but cheaper/low reasoning models are not very good. So, how do you make sure your vendor selling an AI
arXiv:2608.21409v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In medicine, claims remain valid when supported by empirical evidence grounded in stable biological reality. In law, by contrast, truth is contingent,
arXiv:2608.20204v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Legal work, with its heavy reliance on processing large amounts of text, is often considered one of the domains most exposed to the use of LLMs. Contrac
#1 open-weight model on Harvey's Legal Agent benchmark! 🙌 Strong enough to handle professional tasks. Small enough to run on your local machine. Qwen3.8-27B is becoming part of your everyday workflows