Search: “evaluation”

arXiv:2609.23910v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Simulation-based evaluation provides a scalable and repeatable alternative to real-world evaluation of vision-language-action (VLA) policies. However, r

arXiv:2609.15561v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating the factual correctness of large language models (LLMs) is vital for many applications. But are our evaluation tools themselves trustworthy?

arXiv:2609.13520v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Large Language Models have improved rapidly, many fundamental questions remain about how to evaluate the knowledge and reasoning abilities they ac

arXiv:2609.06573v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent studies report that automated red-teaming finds more vulnerabilities, at lower cost, than human red-teaming on standard AI safety benchmarks, and

arXiv:2510.08831v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As AI writing tools become widespread, we need to understand how both humans and machines evaluate literary style, a domain where objective standard

arXiv:2609.04298v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating agents on the growing number of agentic benchmarks is challenging because they often require complex environments and agent integrations. We

arXiv:2603.18579v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evaluating whether explanations faithfully reflect a model's reasoning remains an open problem. Existing benchmarks use single interventions w

arXiv:2609.02302v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A core obstacle to alignment evaluation is evaluation awareness: capable models can tell when they are being tested rather than deployed, weakening the

arXiv:2609.02745v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Selecting a retrieval model for a production RAG system requires reliable comparative evaluation, but obtaining relevance judgments at scale is expens

arXiv:2608.30895v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Performance evaluation for surface-water segmentation commonly uses an aggregate metric such as global intersection-over-union (IoU) to rank model confi

arXiv:2608.29856v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used as scalable evaluators for open-ended tasks. However, many LLM judges derive query-specific criteria during

arXiv:2608.31108v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Efficient evaluation changes the protocol used to support claims about model behavior, yet it is rarely tested whether those claims remain stable after

arXiv:2608.26674v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As large language models are increasingly deployed to simulate diverse human characters, ensuring persona fidelity, defined as the extent to which an

arXiv:2608.25089v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Crosslingual evaluation of language models that enables fair comparisons remains a fundamental challenge in multilingual NLP. Existing studies adopt a v

arXiv:2608.25238v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In dynamic collaborative systems, the selection of reliable collaborators is critical to ensuring effective task execution. Existing trust evaluation

arXiv:2608.23705v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly capable of generating text that challenges human performance in domains requiring creativity, yet evalua

arXiv:2608.20797v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating language-guided mobile agents has recently shifted from rule-based to model-based approaches to achieve scalable and automated assessments. H

arXiv:2608.20392v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-powered meeting assistants are deployed at scale, yet systematic evaluation of their grounding fidelity remains limited to static benchmarks that

arXiv:2508.19008v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Building on a human-led thematic analysis of clinical life-story interviews (> 150,000 words) with inpatients with Borderline Personality Disorder,

arXiv:2603.23522v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evaluating large language models (LLMs) on open-ended questions is difficult because response quality depends on the question's context. Binar

arXiv:2608.00717v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Rubric-based AI systems for thesis assessment use criterion weights to assign different levels of importance to evaluation criteria. These weights are

arXiv:2608.01810v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Rubric-based LLM-as-judge pipelines often assume that evaluation criteria provide independent signals. In practice, however, criteria can be behaviorall

arXiv:2607.28801v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Benchmark datasets are central to evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs), yet they are typically conceived as monolithic tasks, obscuring substantial

arXiv:2607.22561v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-as-a-judge has become the standard for automated evaluation, but it suffers from high cost, significant latency, and opaque decisions -- limitations

arXiv:2607.20862v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: At present, reliable evaluation of non-verifiable tasks remains challenging. Existing approaches often fail to adequately capture the diverse evaluative

arXiv:2607.19949v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Smartphone personal assistants reason over longitudinal personal data, yet evaluating them requires context-rich evaluation data whose correct answers a

arXiv:2607.05046v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating generative AI models is a routine, but resource-intensive, process that is conducted over and over again during the course of model developme

arXiv:2607.02642v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating embodied robot foundation models remains a critical bottleneck; unlike large language models efficiently assessed via digital benchmarks, rob

arXiv:2606.29228v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Despite the capability of parallel decoding, diffusion large language models (dLLMs) require many denoising steps to maintain generation quality, motiva

arXiv:2606.07936v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Human evaluation plays a critical role in assessing the quality of generated text. However, the reliability and reproducibility of these evaluations d

arXiv:2606.08926v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge graph completion (KGC) models are commonly evaluated using rank-based metrics such as MRR and Hits@K, despite different users often requiring

arXiv:2606.01629v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for long-form generation, reliably evaluating long-form outputs has become a critical challenge. L

arXiv:2605.23055v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Frontier language models sometimes recognize that they are being evaluated and adjust their behavior, undermining validity of benchmark results. Yet t

arXiv:2605.04454v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Alignment evaluation in machine learning has largely become evaluation of models. Influential benchmarks score model outputs under fixed inputs, such

arXiv:2604.23990v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper presents PSA-Eval, a failure-centered runtime evaluation framework for deployed trilingual public-space agents. The central claim is that, wh

arXiv:2510.10073v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large vision-language model (LVLM)-based web agents are emerging as powerful tools for automating complex online tasks. However, when deployed

arXiv:2604.08595v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing evaluation methods for LLM-based AI systems, such as LLM-as-a-Judge, verdict systems, and NLI, do not always align well with human assessment

arXiv:2610.14029v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-as-a-judge evaluation commonly aggregates multiple judges' decisions into a majority vote, yet this panel decision process does not guarantee that t

arXiv:2603.07427v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents, existing safety evaluations face a fundamental trade-off: manual benchmarks are costl

arXiv:2610.01618v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent evaluations increasingly go beyond a single success rate, reporting metrics such as cost, consistency, and robustness. Yet they typically treat th

arXiv:2610.01579v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Climate downscaling aims to reconstruct fine scale spatial fields from coarse resolution inputs. Evaluating the quality of these reconstructions is ch

arXiv:2606.22826v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Evaluating LLMs across many model variants---quantized, fine-tuned, or deployment-specific---requires running large benchmarks repeatedly, a process

arXiv:2609.31635v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Clinical trajectory models are usually evaluated by next-event accuracy on observed histories. Simulation is different: models must condition on their o

arXiv:2609.35583v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robustness evaluation must examine diverse visual perturbations, while benchmarks cover only some real-world conditions and physical testing is costly.

arXiv:2609.29578v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon tool agents often make useful progress without reaching terminal success, motivating partial-credit evaluation. Yet evaluators may reward m

arXiv:2609.21490v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Gender bias remains a persistent concern in machine translation (MT), affecting both generated translations and their automatic evaluation. When a sourc