Search: “benchmark”

The full K2 Horizon lineup is out on Artificial Analysis. The AA intelligence vs. parameters plots show that - 0.9B and 375B are bad - 3.7B and 7B are SOTA - 36B A4B is SOTA for hardware with poor mem

VLLM Benchmark: Prefill, Prompt processing - avg, 871.93 tok/s (3 hours constant running xhigh) - 10K prompt, 1000.26 tok/s (16 runs) - 90K prompt, 743,59 tok/s (16 runs) Decode, tok gen - avg, 38.39

my question about LLM performance We see a lot of posts about token prediction, token generation per second, etc. But is it really the metric? I can see that DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (with DSPark; mac s

Hey everyone — I’m building TensorSharp, an open-source LLM inference engine. Here are the latest DeepSeek V4.1 Flash GGUF results using its native ggml_cuda backend. Setup: 8× NVIDIA A40, layer split

I'm testing a new approach for reducing the cost of image-based LLM inference. I evaluated it on the MOMA Graph benchmark, using 1,315 questions. Compared with using GPT-4o to process the original ima

I used an LLM to iteratively evolve an optimization algorithm rather than solve the packing directly. Starting from a simple seed solver, the LLM proposes algorithmic changes guided by a scoreboard of

I'm using DS-V4-Flash-Vision with Q8_K_XL quantization locally as my everyday engine, and for some time now I've been doing a lot of comparisons with Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, also with Q8_K_XL quantization

Hi, I've been wanting to run my own local LLM for some time and I finally saved enough to get a budget GPU. I can spend 700 at most, and I'm looking for a GPU that can run quantized 30B~ parameter mod

How good/bad is it against comparable MoEs the same size? How does it compare against Qwen 3.6 35BA3B? Since we don't have 3.8 35B this seems like an upgrade if we look at some benchmarks like termina

I've tried both and been having this debate with myself for the last few days, on two Asus Ascent GX10s (effectively the same as 2x DGX Spark): DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 (official weights) GLM-5.3-Flash

We have been working on an open-source, model-neutral agent harness for general purpose agents called TrueForge, and wanted to understand how much the harness itself actually matters. So we ran 14 tas

This was my first serious attempt at tuning a local LLM. I started because Qwen3.8-27B IQ3 was fast on my RTX 5080 but the coding quality disappointed me, and the Q4 profiles I tried in LM Studio were

I've made a modification of llama.cpp MTP for people that want to run models like QWEN 27B on 16GB and similar setup, the focus is reducing the memory cost of MTP allowing more speed for less ctx cost

I built SpeakoFlow Mini, an Apache-2.0 fine-tune of Qwen3.5-0.8B for dictation cleanup. It is not a chat model or a general rewriter. It takes speech-to-text output, applies corrections the speaker ac

Benchmarked qwen3.8 xhigh, medium and muse glimmer. Xhigh effort mode with qwen3.8 took almost 30hrs. (And still failed on 16 cases because of the 32K output token limit) Medium effort mode and muse g

At $10k, you could get - 6.2B tokens with Qwen 3.8 Max (Qwen Pro plan) - 5.7B tokens with DeepSeek V4 Pro OpenRouter - 100B tokens with DeepSeek V4 Flash OpenRouter As a firm believer of local inferen

I ran the Aider benchmark on Qwen 3.8 27B FP8 with FP8 KV cache 256K context vLLM. The score: 72.9 This matches Gemini 2.5 Pro from 2025-04-12 which also scored 72.9. Beats Claude Opus 4 from 2025-05-

Thanks to Unsloth Dynamic 3.0 quants coming in slightly leaner and better preserved, I settled on Qwen 3.8 27B (`UD_Q4_K_XL`) at 100K context as my daily driver for Hermes Agent and OpenCode. On an RT

I'm running Qwen 3.8 27B locally on a single GPU. I can push the context to 131k, but I'd rather run it faster at 64k if the agent can manage context properly. What I have in mind is pretty simple: on

Here's a brand new Blackwell-native, prefill-optimized 4-bit quant that runs 50% faster on compatible hardware than a Q4 quant of the same memory footprint. And it runs 4-7% faster than other NVFP4 qu

Hey LocalLlama, Henry from Cactus here! When we trained Needle 2, I had a strict rule to not expose the model to any data sample that remotely felt like these benchmarks. It seemed over-the-top, but b

TL;DR: On a Qwen3.6-35B-A3B Q6 setup sized for 64K context on a 24GB RTX 3090, spilling eight MoE expert layers to CPU freed enough VRAM to increase -b from 512 to 1024 and -ub from 128 to 512. Prompt

Liquid AI released LFM2.5-2.6B today, and this might be more relevant to local AI than another massive model most people cannot run. The model is only 2.69B parameters, has 128K context, supports tool

DeepSeek V4 Flash: Preview → 2026-07-31 Benchmark Preview 0731 Δ Terminal Bench* 56.9 82.7 +25.8 Toolathlon 51.8 70.3 +18.5 NL2Repo — 54.2 new Cybergym — 76.7 new DeepSWE — 54.4 new Agent Last Exam —

https://reddit.com/link/1v5rvuq/video/bgmwc754i9fh1/player My goal was to create a benchmark to measure the spatial awareness and memory of models. Eventually, I came up with the simple idea of a maze

The interesting finding from a new [arXiv paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16165) isn't that a frontier vision model failed a new benchmark, that happens weekly, but the specific shape of the failure

Disclosure: I work at NuMind, the team that trained NuExtract3. NuExtract3 is an Apache-2.0, open-weight 4B VLM based on Qwen3.5-4B. It is specialized for document understanding rather than general ch

MODEL + GGUF : https://huggingface.co/InternScience/models?search=a1-4b Technical Report Benchmark Qwen3.5-4B Agents-A1-4B Qwen3.5 Qwen3.6 Nex-N2-mini Agents-A1 🧠 Dense Models (~4B) 🔀 MoE Models (35B-

I'd need to search for this specific Reddit post to provide accurate details about the actual findings and technical specifics of this GPU performance benchmark. This post likely discusses throughput

Hey everyone, I recently put together a local LLM machine using mostly second hand hardware. I wanted to experiment with local models for app development without spending a fortune on a new workstatio

Hello! We've been busy at Telperion with a lot of experimental research (more coming soon). Today, we're announcing the release of our latent attention variants of Qwen3.8-27B. Our latent attention va

Sampling: temp 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 for both. Run with evalscope over the OpenAI-compatible API: Qwen3.8-Next on Strata (MI50 32GB), Qwen3.8-27B on llama.cpp (RX 7900 XTX 24GB). Caveat: These are

I was curious about OpenResearch by alphaXiv. 'Turn your coding agents into research agents'? Sounds great! Just what I needed to save time on my experiments. So I copy pasted their repo into Claude a

I’ve been building SonicBoom, a native tensor runtime written in C++/CUDA with a C ABI and no Python anywhere in the stack. I just tagged v0.0.1, and the first target is local LLM inference on consume

Hi r/MachineLearning, Stjepan from Manning here. The mods approved this post, and I appreciate being welcomed back to share another book with you. We’ve just launched AI Recommender Systems: Transform

Write-up: https://zhebrak.io/posts/brokenml/ Repo: https://github.com/zhebrak/brokenml I built a benchmark to determine the access level agents need to successfully fix broken ML workloads (PyTorch ov

DISCLAIMER: the post and the model card was made with the assist of AI. Hiya, I’m releasing Recursive BitNet N-Gram 102M, a small experiment combining ternary weights, shared transformer layers, and h

Around 3 weeks ago, I posted on this subreddit about how Jev used my one-year-old architecture, og post: https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/s/VpuMJt577S Then, just after that, I introduced Laya, the

I've been using Claude Opus 5.5 to speed up Qwen3.8-27B on my PC (rtx 3090), it wrote a CUDA megakernel that is 1.4-1.9x faster than llama.cpp depending on the task/context length. The results and cod

Been seeing quite a few posts about Strata lately, so I figured I'd give it a shot on my RTX PRO 6000 and I am very impressed. Most of the benchmarks I've seen are using IQ2 or IQ3 quants, so I wanted

Yesterday TechCrunch published a piece about a growing problem for AI agents: websites are starting to block them. Amazon blocking Meta's Muse is the obvious example. At almost exactly the same time,

I’m hitting rate limits on Together AI. For context, I’ve been working on an agentic repository indexing and benchmark generation tool, and I’m running multiple agents in parallel across models like L

My current setup: - single 3090 running turboderp/Qwen3.8-27B-exl3:SC_5.00bpw_H6_V6 - ~150k context, ~60t/s, unknown prefill because I didn't benchmark it (but it is ok) - Intel 12400 CPU with 32GB DD

Introducing InferBench: A benchmark testing how well frontier LLMs infer a user's priorities from their instructions. We tested 12 LLMs across 20 scenarios with 2.8k conversations to see which models

I’ve seen posts here raving about how good Qwen 3.8 27b is. The benchmarks look incredible, and all the online discourse seems to deem it the best local model. I have 32GB VRAM and run Unsloth’s Q6 ve

Over the past several months, we conducted an empirical post-mortem investigation into 109 autonomous AI agent security incidents (cataloged with 193 falsification criteria across tool-use and multi-a