Search: “evaluation”

arXiv:2512.01113v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Algorithmic reasoning -- the ability to perform step-by-step logical inference -- is a synthetic benchmark for evaluating multi-step reasoning

arXiv:2603.16307v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Remote sensing underpins crucial applications such as disaster relief and ecological field surveys, where systems must understand complex scenes and

arXiv:2607.08681v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As agentic AI systems are increasingly applied to cyber-physical environments, their evaluation requires assessment of both task performance and trustwo

arXiv:2607.06196v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current AI safety evaluation and benchmarking frameworks predominantly rely on Western-centric culture-agnostic defaults that mask critical regional law

arXiv:2607.06052v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Humanoid robots are increasingly expected to perform contact-rich tasks that require not only accurate whole-body motion but also robust physical intera

arXiv:2607.04560v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Web domain credibility evaluation is vital for combating misinformation. It is conducted by examining factors such as domain type, transparency, and ove

arXiv:2603.16432v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Unsupervised physical parameter estimation from video lacks a common benchmark: existing methods evaluate on non-overlapping synthetic data, the sol

arXiv:2602.06625v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Existing LLM-as-a-Judge systems suffer from three fundamental limitations: limited adaptivity to task- and domain-specific evaluation criteria, syst

arXiv:2606.28673v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sign Languages (SLs) are the primary means of communication for millions of deaf individuals, yet existing evaluation metrics for generated SL remain si

arXiv:2606.30561v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern AI evaluation frameworks treat evaluator disagreement as noise to be resolved. In creative domains, professional disagreement reflects genuine di

arXiv:2606.27997v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Benchmarks of machine learning models often include many datasets, making evaluation expensive. For efficiency, it is preferable to perform evaluations

arXiv:2606.25750v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safety evaluation of large language models (LLMs) is commonly performed by querying models with unsafe or jailbreak prompts and judging whether their

arXiv:2606.24986v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated cattle posture-classification systems frequently report near-perfect accuracy, yet their robustness under realistic deployment conditions rema

arXiv:2606.23927v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic AI systems powered by large language models (LLMs) are rapidly evolving into autonomous decision-making systems, exposing attack vectors beyond

arXiv:2606.23339v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Human-robot interaction (HRI) evaluation relies almost exclusively on human-completed questionnaires, leaving the robot's perspective unexamined. We pro

arXiv:2606.11909v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Benchmarks are essential for evaluating embodied spatial intelligence, yet their construction is labor-intensive, hard to reuse, and difficult to mainta

arXiv:2606.11260v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Humans process rich auditory environments through tightly integrated cognitive capabilities such as audio perception, audio reasoning, and memory. Des

arXiv:2606.10254v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved near-perfect performance in solving high-school mathematics, their ability to evaluate the diverse reas

arXiv:2606.09578v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly evaluated on table reasoning tasks, but the role of table representation

arXiv:2606.07229v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce MMAE, a Massive Multitask Audio Editing benchmark, serving as the first comprehensive evaluation testbed designed for general-purpose ins

arXiv:2602.12147v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Time series foundation models (TSFMs) are revolutionizing the forecasting landscape from specific dataset modeling to generalizable task evaluation.

arXiv:2603.01576v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Geo-Foundation Models (GFMs) have been evaluated across diverse Earth observation task including multiple domains and have demonstrated strong poten

arXiv:2606.03693v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Medical Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are typically evaluated on English radiology visual question answering benchmarks, leaving their robustness under

arXiv:2501.04661v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The web-scale of pretraining data has created an important evaluation challenge: to disentangle linguistic competence on cases well-represente

arXiv:2507.12453v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In automated machine learning, scientific discovery, and other applications of Bayesian optimization, deciding when to stop evaluating expensive bla

arXiv:2605.31381v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We evaluate the consistency of automated judges in conducting a multi-dimensional safety evaluation in a reference-free setup. Our results indicate that

arXiv:2605.28844v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Learning-assisted algorithm design often has to make reliable search decisions under small evaluation budgets, where committing to a single metaheuris

arXiv:2602.18481v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to a surge of financial benchmarks, evolving from static knowledge evaluation to

arXiv:2605.27761v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid development of GUI foundation models and mobile GUI agents has spurred numerous evaluation benchmarks, yet most rely on simulated environments

arXiv:2605.26036v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Urban representation learning encodes complex urban environments into general-purpose embeddings for diverse downstream tasks and emerging urban foundat

arXiv:2605.24981v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Choosing a Large Language Model (LLM) for a given task requires comparing many strong candidates, yet standard evaluation relies on costly annotations o

arXiv:2605.24850v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating whether large language models (LLMs) capture the structure of natural language beyond local fluency remains an open challenge. Existing evalu

arXiv:2605.23362v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating large language models increasingly relies on LLM-as-a-judge protocols, but such evaluations remain costly: different judges have different pr

arXiv:2605.23170v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Position-controlled evaluation is standard for retrieval tasks such as Needle-in-a-Haystack and RULER, but mainstream reasoning benchmarks do not cont

arXiv:2605.22643v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Background. Traditional safety benchmarks for language models evaluate generated text: whether a model outputs toxic language, reproduces bias, or follo

arXiv:2605.22079v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are widely used to generate structured outputs such as JSON, SQL, and code, yet public resources remain limited for evaluat

arXiv:2605.19196v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep research agents increasingly automate complex information-seeking tasks, producing evidence-grounded reports via multi-step reasoning, tool use, an

arXiv:2510.18941v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evaluating progress in large language models (LLMs) is often constrained by the challenge of verifying responses, limiting assessments to task

arXiv:2605.16116v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Developing and evaluating e-commerce web agents requires environments that preserve meaningful task structure while enabling controllable, reproducible,

arXiv:2605.13950v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous language-model agents are increasingly evaluated on long-horizon tool-use tasks, but existing benchmarks rarely capture the complexity and

arXiv:2605.14635v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper introduces a multi-label visual emotion analysis benchmark dataset for comprehensively evaluating the ability of multimodal large language

arXiv:2512.24985v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Vision Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly adopted as central reasoning modules for embodied agents. Existing benchmarks evaluate their capabili

arXiv:2510.09333v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evaluating generative models is challenging because standard metrics often fail to reflect human preferences. Human evaluations are more relia

arXiv:2605.09269v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Aligning Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) requires reliable reward models, yet existing single-step evaluators can suffer from lazy judging, exp

arXiv:2505.22919v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Existing benchmarks for evaluating the clinical reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) often lack a clear definition of 'clinical re

arXiv:2605.08827v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The safety of mental health AI is often judged at the wrong temporal scale. Current evaluations typically score isolated responses, endpoint outcomes, o