Model Releases
16 bit better than lower quants for Qwen3.6-27B
I am writing a fairly complex C++ windows MFC application. I have a few 3090s and can run F16 Qwen3.6-27B with 256K context and MTP. The quality of code is exceptional with this quant vs its lower qua
I am writing a fairly complex C++ windows MFC application. I have a few 3090s and can run F16 Qwen3.6-27B with 256K context and MTP. The quality of code is exceptional with this quant vs its lower quants. The others are good but they get stuck in difficult situations like managing design with multiple threads, etc. Not saying F16 is as good as Claude but it gets the job done. Just throwing it out there for folks who may be swayed by tps. If you are making simple web apps, you can get by with lower quants. For high quality of code with edge cases use the 16 bit quants. A bad choice taken by the same LLM at lower quant could easily mean the loss of an afternoon. submitted by /u/TinyFrodo [link] [comments]
Related
- BeeLlama.cpp: advanced DFlash & TurboQuant with support of reasoning and vision. Qwen 3.6 27B Q5 with 200k context on 3090, 2-3x faster than baseline (peak 135 tps!)
- Deepseek V4 flash - Hy3 or is Qwen3.6 27B still the most solid for agentic/coding?
- DKV: Open-source KV-cache compression framework for local LLM inference (CLI + technical report)
Source: r/LocalLLaMA | 2026-07-26