Agents
50K likes on this!? Most of what Karpthy has shared is things we have been doing for over a year. No surprises, as many replies are highligh…
50K likes on this!? Most of what Karpthy has shared is things we have been doing for over a year. No surprises, as many replies are highlighting. But I still think this raises an interesting discussio
50K likes on this!? Most of what Karpthy has shared is things we have been doing for over a year. No surprises, as many replies are highlighting. But I still think this raises an interesting discussion. Is there a universal interface/langauge that allows more seamless communication between agents and humans? I believe there is. And I think that is what @karpathy is suggesting we think about. Right now, ideas are all scattered. As some of you know, I have been early on LLM Wikis, Artifacts, AI-generated visual explainers, dynamic interactives, etc. Over the past couple of months, I have been experimenting with a new universal interface for seamless human-agent collaboration. So I have a lot to share, but it's still too early, and I frankly haven't found the perfect solution. In short, my current optimal setup (see a simple snapshot attached) ties my high-level agent to highly flexible Notion-like pages that support embedding artifacts, text, videos, visual explainers, and just about anything an LLM can generate. And if it doesn't support it yet, I ask it to build it on the fly. It's crazy sometimes, the features it builds, but this is a co-evolved interface that satisfies both my agent's and my needs. The interface supports code review, note-taking, writing, research, prototyping, mock designing, and so on. In fact, I have now wired my agents to intelligently spit out these artifacts (for lack of a better word), depending on the task/instruction, instead of the default text responses, which are frankly overwhelming and hard to read at times. In other words, as I keep building this "universal interface," it feels less and less like I am chatting with an agent; I'm collaborating with it directly through the artifacts (through comments and suggestions). It allows me to move faster. I can consume and review faster. I am better organized. It feels like a language both the agent and I can speak fluently, so there is very little friction. Listen, this is all a personal experience. I don't think everyone will use interfaces like this. But it's been interesting to see Artifacts gain wide adoption, and now dots have Spaces that look a little like what I built here several months ago. More to share soon. We'll be spending a lot more time trying to understand the outputs of language models. A few thoughts, tips & tricks: Writing. Something I've had success with: Ask your LLM to explain something in ASD-STE100, it's a controlled language specification originally developed for aeros…
Related
- Another interesting approach to self-evolve agent skills. But it's important to know that skill self-evolution loops fail in two specific wa…
- Very interesting new paper from Microsoft and colleagues. (bookmark it) Skill libraries are used in every major harness on the assumption th…
- The most important agentic workflows are the ones where you collaborate with the agent, verify its results, and encode them as a skill or ve…
- This was one of the standout AI papers of the week. (bookmark it) It tackles a question most self-improving AI agents ignore: is the agent a…
Source: DAIR.AI (X) | 2026-10-04