Agents
A Global View of How LLMs Value Human Time
arXiv:2610.18515v2 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly act as personal assistants; however, little is known about how they capture national-level preferences on a
arXiv:2610.18515v2 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly act as personal assistants; however, little is known about how they capture national-level preferences on a global scale. Given that "time" is a universal and representative concept, we examine LLMs' time preferences by varying only users' country and measuring the compensation LLMs deem appropriate for a 60-minute appointment delay. We then compare LLMs' responses with GDP per capita on Purchasing Power Parity (GDP_PPP), Mean Income, and a literature-based index (Patience Score). Our results across 193 countries and 5 LLMs demonstrate that people's time across the world is evaluated in noticeably different ways among LLMs, as well as varying levels of robustness under prompt variations. LLMs consistently recommend the highest compensation for Europe, but mostly the lowest for Africa. Based on GDP_PPP, LLMs underestimate the value of time for users living in Asia and South America. These findings indicate that geographical patterns are embedded in LLMs and may translate in different treatment in agentic settings.
Related
- OmegaUse-SOP: SOP Engineering for Professional Computer Use from Human Demonstrations
- Grounded Optimization: A Layered Engineering Framework for Reducing LLM Hallucination in Automated Personal Document Rewriting
- Shopping by algorithm: How agentic AI deploys human heuristics as a surrogate consumer
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-10-15