Model Releases
Agent skills are great. I wanted to share some of my favorites from Jesse Vincent's 'Superpowers' skill pack π ππππππ-πππππ skillβ¦
Agent skills are great. I wanted to share some of my favorites from Jesse Vincent's 'Superpowers' skill pack π ππππππ-πππππ skill produces much better plans than any harness' built in plan mode that I'
Agent skills are great. I wanted to share some of my favorites from Jesse Vincent's 'Superpowers' skill pack π ππππππ-πππππ skill produces much better plans than any harness' built in plan mode that I've tried. Your agent will ask you a set of thoughtful questions one-by-one in the terminal (not in any specialized Q&A component). This pattern makes the agent thoughtful about its follow up questions, rather than generating a set of similar questions that warrant duplicate responses. Your agent then steps through each section of the plan with you, which is a great UX because it gives you breathing room to review each part and challenge assumptions (instead of throwing a huge doc at you)! It writes the final plan doc to file and lets you give further feedback, which is translated to very precise edits (versus Claude Code's built-in plan mode which rewrites the entire plan). Plans generally feel more polished. I think this is because they're more thoroughly researched, and success criteria is spec-driven rather than hand-wavy ππ‘πππππππ-πππππ skill makes agents much better at long-horizon coding work. This skill outlines two modes to implement a plan: 1) subagent driven, and 2) orchestrator-driven. I always choose subagent driven (Superpowers recommends this if your harness supports subagents). Selecting this mode will invoke the ππππππππ-ππππππ-πππππππππππ skill. Each task (a section of the plan your agent generated prior) is completed, assessed, and polished by a team of three subagents: an implementer, a spec reviewer, and a code quality reviewer. These agents iterate until the task satisfies the spec. If all looks good, your agent moves on to the next task (and spawns a new set of subagents) ππππππππππ-ππππ-ππππππ skill is invoked when I ask my agent to review a PR. To me, the review it produces matches Codex's /ππππππ mode in raw quality but feels more flexible. If you ask Codex to justify a review comment, it seems to lose all context from the review itself (outside of the final review output). With this skill, your agent retains the full context and does a good job backing up its comments πππππππππππππ skill has a really neat process called "visual companion" which the agent invokes when making frontend changes that are expensive to iterate on visually. When I was designing a 'thinking' loading indicator for a chat UI, my agent invoked this skill, then spun up localhost to show me variations of the spinner in isolation (so I didn't consume tokens while testing). This sounds gimmicky but it's the type of thoughtful polish that gets me really excited about using a product There's a lot of slop skills out there, but I believe well-written skills have the potential to drastically change the behavior of your agents
Related
- SkillTrojan: Backdoor Attacks on Skill-Based Agent Systems
- SkillSieve: A Hierarchical Triage Framework for Detecting Malicious AI Agent Skills
- what he said π£οΈ the very best agents today obsessively tailor the harness layer around the model Iβm looking at you β5 things I learned froβ¦
- 'Claude Code isn't magic. The harness layer is just software, and software is something any dev can shape to fit how they want to work.' Cheβ¦
- Multi-Agent Orchestration is a great tool in building agentic products thankfully @sydneyrunkle put together a guide with runnable code for β¦
Source: Harrison Chase (X) | 2026-04-10