Agents
An accurate characterization of the arc of AI is that it is shaped by two trends: 1. Moving more and more logic to a neural model for tasks …
An accurate characterization of the arc of AI is that it is shaped by two trends: 1. Moving more and more logic to a neural model for tasks where training data can be densely sampled (e.g. the shift f
An accurate characterization of the arc of AI is that it is shaped by two trends: 1. Moving more and more logic to a neural model for tasks where training data can be densely sampled (e.g. the shift from pre-DL feature engineering to end-to-end learning circa 2013-2016, and more recently the trend of baking more and more harness functionality directly into models over time) 2. Achieving more and more powerful / generalizable systems by leveraging those neural models in sophisticated neurosymbolic architectures, e.g. AlphaGo instead of an end-to-end Go-player model (2016), the Waymo neurosymbolic architecture instead of a single end-to-end vehicle control model (early 2020s), TTA LRMs and coding agent harnesses instead of plain LLM inference (now). As far as I can tell, this dual trend will keep going. You can always do more with a neurosymbolic system than with just the neural model inside it.
Related
- Outlook where frontier AI is headed next 18 months: The AI reasoning training + harness loop works if you can produce enough data and reason…
- Scaling Scientific Discovery Environments for Turn-Level Agentic RL
- When an agent is allowed to decompose a goal into smaller sub-tasks, it frequently suffers from goal drift. Left unchecked, it will redefine…
Source: Francois Chollet (X) | 2026-08-06