Industry
Anthropic folk are pretty consistent on their p(Doom). @DarioAmodei is publicly at 25% I think the difference now is that post Navier-Stokes…
Anthropic folk are pretty consistent on their p(Doom). @DarioAmodei is publicly at 25% I think the difference now is that post Navier-Stokes its really, really tough to say AI isn't/won't be smarter t
Anthropic folk are pretty consistent on their p(Doom). @DarioAmodei is publicly at 25% I think the difference now is that post Navier-Stokes its really, really tough to say AI isn't/won't be smarter than us & can't do new things Tipping point https://www.axios.com/2025/09/17/anthropic-dario-amodei-p-doom-25-percent
Related
- Putting the generative drama aside a nice write up by Terry Tao on the Navier Stokes advances It would seem that Buckmaster & Apolge were we…
- Did OpenAI just solve Navier–Stokes—and what would that actually mean for AGI? @EMostaque joins me LIVE now to examine the claimed breakthro…
- Bet this happens with Navier Stokes and it’s going to be something not even related to PDEs that solves it
Source: Emad Mostaque (X) | 2026-09-10