Anthropic says Opus 4.7 hits 80.6% on Document Reasoning — up from 57.1%. But 'reasoning about documents' ≠ 'parsing documents for agents.' …

Anthropic says Opus 4.7 hits 80.6% on Document Reasoning — up from 57.1%. But "reasoning about documents" ≠ "parsing documents for agents." We ran it on ParseBench. → Charts: 13.5% → 55.8% (+42.3) — huge → Formatting: 64.2% → 69.4% (+5.2) → Content: 89.7% → 90.3% (+0.6) → Tables: 86.5% → 87.2% (+0.7) → Layout: 16.5% → 14.0% (-2.5) — regressed Real chart gains, but at ~1.5¢/page. Enterprise scale? Not yet. LlamaParse Agentic: 84.9% overall. ~1.2¢/page. The frontier for general document understanding is long. No single model solves it. → http://github.com/run-llama/ParseBench

Source: Jerry Liu (X) | 2026-04-16