Model Releases
Benchmarking Literature Retrieval for a Model Organism: A Dictyostelium Case Study
arXiv:2610.03130v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Biological literature retrieval systems are often developed and evaluated using broad biomedical corpora and general-purpose search tasks. However, ma
arXiv:2610.03130v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Biological literature retrieval systems are often developed and evaluated using broad biomedical corpora and general-purpose search tasks. However, many curated knowledge bases operate in narrower model-organism domains, where the literature is sparse and terminology is organism-specific. We introduce a retrieval benchmark from dictyBase for Dictyostelium, a model organism in cell and developmental biology. The benchmark consists of curator-generated biological queries linked to PubMed-indexed articles, together with structured gene annotations. Using this benchmark, we study three factors in niche biological retrieval: cross-encoder reranking, gene-aware query expansion, and abstract-only versus full-text retrieval. We report that reranking and gene-aware query expansion improve retrieval selectively: reranking is most useful when the model is well suited to biological evidence matching, whereas curated annotations help clarify compact biological queries by reducing vocabulary mismatch. Full-text chunks substantially improve retrieval when abstracts omit supporting evidence, increasing both candidate recall and top-rank performance, although these cases are harder than queries supported by abstracts. Data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/fulaibaowang/dictycite, and the benchmark dataset is additionally archived on Zenodo.
Related
- DrugRAG: Enhancing Pharmacy LLM Performance Through A Novel Retrieval-Augmented Generation Pipeline
- Benchmarking Retrieval Strategies for Biomedical Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Controlled Empirical Study
- Evaluating Open-Weight LLMs for Turkish Domain Documents Under Retrieval and Hardware Constraints
- Generalistic or Specific Embeddings, Which is Better? An Empirical Study on Search for Clinical Coding in Non-English Languages
Source: arXiv cs.CL | 2026-10-05