Model Releases
Beyond Thresholds: A Quality-Aware Decision Intelligence Framework for Cold Chain IoT Systems
arXiv:2608.15082v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cold chain logistics has advanced technologically, yet most deployed systems remain reactive monitors, not decision-making agents: thresholds trigger al
arXiv:2608.15082v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cold chain logistics has advanced technologically, yet most deployed systems remain reactive monitors, not decision-making agents: thresholds trigger alerts, but nothing relates violations to cumulative product degradation or converts degradation signals into logistics decisions. We address this gap with a Quality-Aware Decision Intelligence (QADI) framework combining three capabilities: a structured quality state representation, S_q = [L, Q, U, R] -- remaining shelf life, degradation rate, estimation uncertainty, and operational risk, all derived and computable from the framework equations; a hybrid quality modeling layer combining physics-based microbial kinetics with a data-driven correction term; and a reasoning layer built on Microsoft Phi-4ite{Phi4} with retrieval-augmented generation over a structured domain knowledge base. We benchmark against five baselines -- threshold monitoring, physics-only, physics-plus-noise, optimisation-based decisions, and a rule-based expert system -- across eight cold chain scenarios, using pasteurised milk as the primary case, with ground truth shelf-life drawn from published dairy studiesite{Singh1994, Smigic2015} independent of our model. Comparisons use Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm correction. Across milk and broccoli scenarios, the framework attains mean absolute shelf-life error of 7.2 hours (versus 30.9 hours, physics-only; p<0.001), spoilage rate of 14.5% (versus 16.6%, physics-only and rule-based; p=0.08), and oracle-optimal decisions in 99.5% of scenarios. Removing the LLM reasoning component drops optimality to 45.5% (p<0.001). Expert-rated explanation quality reaches 83% (kappa = 0.71). Ablations show hybrid modeling and LLM reasoning contribute distinct gains, while RAG retrieval mainly drives explanation quality. Code: https://bit.ly/4d6t44C.
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-08-18