Industry
Boom, the game is changed GLM 5.1 running locally seems to actually work… Now I can run a lot of my @openclaw workflows for the cost of elec…
Clem Delangue (or someone in their network) shared excitement about successfully running GLM 5.1 locally, noting it appears to be functional and effective. The post highlights the cost advantage of ru
Clem Delangue (or someone in their network) shared excitement about successfully running GLM 5.1 locally, noting it appears to be functional and effective. The post highlights the cost advantage of running this language model locally, reducing expenses to essentially just electricity costs. This reflects growing interest in self-hosted AI models as viable alternatives to cloud-based API services, particularly for running automated workflows like those built with OpenClaw.
Related
- More people should work on harnesses for open and local models!
- We just OCR'd 27,000 arxiv papers into Markdown using an open 5B model, 16 parallel HF Jobs on L40S GPUs, and a mounted bucket. Total cost: …
- Open source software will be many times more secure than closed source software in the new Mythos era
- Openclaw real costs: self hosting vs managed hosting vs API fees
- Transformers.js monthly downloads 🤯📈 2023/03 ▏3.2K 2024/03 █ 266K 2025/03 ██ 764K 2026/03 ████████████ 4.4M Thanks so much to this amazing…
Source: Clem Delangue (X) | 2026-04-14