Applications
CoAL-RAG: A Complexity-Aware Legal Retrieval-Augmented Generation Method
arXiv:2608.17536v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Legal consultation questions exhibit multi-level complexity. A single retrieval strategy often leads to over-reasoning for simple questions and poor i
arXiv:2608.17536v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Legal consultation questions exhibit multi-level complexity. A single retrieval strategy often leads to over-reasoning for simple questions and poor interpretability for complex ones, making it difficult to meet the requirements for both answer quality and efficiency in high-risk scenarios. To address this issue, this paper proposes CoAL-RAG, a complexity-aware legal retrieval-augmented generation method, which constructs a multi-dimensional evaluation mechanism based on question essence'' and retrieval consistency'' to enable adaptive routing of retrieval strategies. First, the reasoning demand is quantified according to the logical structure of the question. Then, the discrepancy between semantic retrieval and keyword retrieval is utilized to indirectly reflect problem complexity, thereby selecting the most appropriate retrieval strategy and dynamically filtering contextual information. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms baseline models not only on Chinese legal benchmarks (SocialLawQA, LawBench) but also demonstrates strong cross-jurisdictional generalization on English datasets (LexGLUE, CaseHold). Specifically, on Chinese datasets, the BLEU score improves by 42.5% and ROUGE-L reaches 3.6 times that of knowledge graph-based methods. On English benchmarks, CoAL-RAG maintains highly competitive accuracy, achieving an optimal balance between generation quality, deep logical reasoning, and system efficiency across different legal systems.
Related
- How Much Do Legal RAG Systems Still Hallucinate?
- Retrieval Augmented Generation Framework for the Nepali Legal Domain Question Answering
- Beyond Probabilistic Similarity: Structural, Temporal, and Causal Limitations of Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain
- LP-Eval: Rubric and Dataset for Measuring the Quality of Legal Proposition Generation
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-08-19