Agents
Commitment To Cooperation With Self-Negotiated Contracts
arXiv:2607.22750v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI agents operate with increasing autonomy in a multi-agent world, they will need to learn to cooperate with other agents and with humans to generate
arXiv:2607.22750v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI agents operate with increasing autonomy in a multi-agent world, they will need to learn to cooperate with other agents and with humans to generate mutual benefits. However, cooperation is a challenge because the costs of cooperation are often incurred early on, but the benefits are only realized later, creating an incentive to defect. How can AI agents cooperate with commitment? Here, we draw on inspiration from legal institutions and contracting that human societies have used to solve principal-agent problems of this kind. Contracts provide observable representations of agreements that enable credible commitments through the enforcement of terms. We study the role of contract-based cooperation using LLM-based agents in CT, a spatial-temporal game that combines bargaining with navigation towards a goal. We study a suite of contract representations that range from formal contracts that compile to code to natural contracts that require reinterpretation. We evaluate agents with a range of LLM backbones using different sizes and providers. We find that self-negotiated contracts can improve cooperative outcomes beyond what is possible with regular trading.
Related
- Self-Supervised Goal-Reaching Results in Multi-Agent Cooperation and Exploration
- A Survey of Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning with Graph Neural Network-Based Communication
- Evolve as a Team: Collaborative Self-Evolution for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
- Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-07-28