Model Releases
Consistency-Guided Decoding with Proof-Driven Disambiguation for Three-Way Logical Question Answering
arXiv:2604.06196v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Three-way logical question answering (QA) assigns True/False/Unknown to a hypothesis H given a premise set S. While modern large language models
arXiv:2604.06196v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Three-way logical question answering (QA) assigns True/False/Unknown to a hypothesis H given a premise set S. While modern large language models (LLMs) can be accurate on isolated examples, we identify two recurring failure modes in 3-way logic QA: (i) negation inconsistency, where answers to H and neg H violate the deterministic label mapping, and (ii) epistemic Unknown, where the model predicts Unknown due to uncertainty or instability even when S entails one side. We present CGD-PD, a lightweight test-time layer that (a) queries a single 3-way classifier on both H and a mechanically negated form of H, (b) projects the pair onto a negation-consistent decision when possible, and (c) invokes a proof-driven disambiguation step that uses targeted binary entailment probes to selectively resolve Unknown outcomes, requiring only an average of 4-5 model calls. On the FOLIO benchmark's first-order-logic fields, CGD-PD yields consistent gains across frontier LLMs, with relative improvements in accuracy of up to 16% over the base model, while also reducing Unknown predictions.
Related
- Beyond Facts: Benchmarking Distributional Reading Comprehension in Large Language Models
- LLM Spirals of Delusion: A Benchmarking Audit Study of AI Chatbot Interfaces
- The Stepwise Informativeness Assumption: Why are Entropy Dynamics and Reasoning Correlated in LLMs?
- Illocutionary Explanation Planning for Source-Faithful Explanations in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-04-10