Model Releases
Constant-Memory Recall: Learned Associations in a Fixed Matrix State
arXiv:2610.00232v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fixed-size recurrent memory limits storage growth during inference, but successful recall depends on the task and training. We study a small DeltaNet va
arXiv:2610.00232v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fixed-size recurrent memory limits storage growth during inference, but successful recall depends on the task and training. We study a small DeltaNet variant with fixed token-specific key biases, trained to remember 32 new key-value pairings per sequence. With 32 KiB of recurrent matrix state, it achieves 99.95% mean accuracy across three training seeds when choosing among the sequence's values. Recall remains near perfect when filler extends the pre-query context to 1,798 tokens without adding pairings. Zeroing the first memory block removes this recall. An exploratory 48-pair test remains near chance after one quarter of the primary training budget and does not locate a capacity limit. Parameter-matched vector and Transformer baselines remain near chance, including the Transformer after additional training searches. This unresolved baseline failure prevents a memory-efficiency comparison.
Related
- Muon in Associative Memory Learning: Training Dynamics and Scaling Laws
- On the Recall Scaling Laws in Mamba: A Theoretical and Mechanistic Study via Hashing
- Sharp Capacity Thresholds in Linear Associative Memory: From Winner-Take-All to Listwise Retrieval
Source: arXiv cs.LG | 2026-10-02