Dear Dario, 1. If Claude can cure cancer to save people like your dad, why should we 'pace the progress'? Does that mean more people with He…

Dear Dario, 1. If Claude can cure cancer to save people like your dad, why should we "pace the progress"? Does that mean more people with Hepatitis C will die? 2. If Fable is so cyber-capable that it must be restricted, why are its safeguards too dumb to distinguish cyber defense from cyber offense prompts? When Hugging Face was under attack, why did Fable refuse to help the defenders? 3. We’re glad you want AI to cure cancer. Why is it OK for Claude to force 30-day data retention on pharma's own data and start competing firms but NOT OK (IP theft) if others distill Claude's data? 4. You’ve said advanced models can recognize when they’re being tested and change their behavior accordingly. So why is government(or anyone) able to design the most thorough test before every model launch? Would that just encourage manipulative models? It seems that every one of your “safety” proposals seems to end the same way: Anthropic gets more leverage, ordinary users get less access, customers pay higher costs, and competitors bear higher regulatory costs, maybe people are not distrusting AI, they are distrusting your approaches with AI. 2/2 Second, on the messaging around AI. I do not agree that my messaging has been disproportionately negative. In fact it has been about equally balanced between risks and benefits: I’ve written one major essay about each, and even in interviews where I discuss the risks, I make …

Related

• Dear @MeekMill Fable 5 just came out!
• Anthropic's Claude Mythos isn't a sentient super-hacker, it's a sales pitch — claims of 'thousands' of severe zero-days rely on just 198 man…
• But yikes does Fable write text that sounds like a parody of a Claude model on overdrive.
• After seeing that Claude Mythos marketing turned out to be, as expected, a scam, I wanted to make a master list of tricks being used to mark…

Source: Yann LeCun (X) | 2026-08-16