Model Releases
Empirical Comparison of Agent Communication Protocols for Task Orchestration
arXiv:2603.22823v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Context. The problem of comparative evaluation of communication protocols for task orchestration by large language model (LLM) agents is considered.
arXiv:2603.22823v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Context. The problem of comparative evaluation of communication protocols for task orchestration by large language model (LLM) agents is considered. The object of study is the process of interaction between LLM agents and external tools, as well as between autonomous LLM agents, during task orchestration. Objective. The goal of this work is to develop a systematic pilot benchmark comparing tool integration, multi-agent dele-gation, and hybrid architectures for standardized queries at three levels of complexity, and to quantify the advantages and disadvantages in terms of response time, context window consumption, cost, error recovery, and implementation complexity.
Related
- When Identity Skews Debate: Anonymization for Bias-Reduced Multi-Agent Reasoning
- Silo-Bench: A Scalable Environment for Evaluating Distributed Coordination in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
- Three Roles, One Model: Role Orchestration at Inference Time to Close the Performance Gap Between Small and Large Agents
- How memory can affect collective and cooperative behaviors in an LLM-Based Social Particle Swarm
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-04-24