Tutorials
Epistemic Subordination: Generative AI and the Infrastructure of Knowledge
arXiv:2608.18758v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI does not merely produce biased outputs. It encodes the majority's way of knowing as the default infrastructure of knowledge itself. We c
arXiv:2608.18758v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI does not merely produce biased outputs. It encodes the majority's way of knowing as the default infrastructure of knowledge itself. We call this epistemic subordination. The training process compresses the full breadth of human expression into a single probabilistic model whose statistical baseline reflects the languages, assumptions, and cultural frameworks of the dominant culture. Minority epistemologies are not excluded but absorbed: present in the training data, yet structurally subordinated in the output. The result is not a collection of discrete biases that can be audited and corrected. It is an epistemic condition embedded in the architecture from which all outputs emerge. This unified harm cuts across three legal domains -- anti-discrimination law, cultural and linguistic rights, and democratic viewpoint pluralism -- and each fails to address it for the same structural reason: existing law regulates downstream, at the level of decisions and applications. The remedy must match the site of harm. If epistemic subordination is produced at the level of model training, then law must learn to govern at that level.
Related
- The Hitchhiker's Guide to Monoculture
- 'If You're Very Clever, No One Knows You've Used It': The Social Dynamics of Developing Generative AI Literacy in the Workplace
- Personalized Generative Models for Contextual Debiasing
- Identifying Harm in Personalized, Generative AI Systems Requires User-Centered Auditing at the Interaction Level
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-08-20