Evaluating and Improving LLM Self-Modeling

arXiv:2608.30980v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study self-modeling: an LLM's ability to answer questions about its own behavior. We focus on verifiable behavioral questions, such as whether a prompt edit would change the model's final answer. To measure this capability, we introduce a benchmark that tests diverse types of self-modeling questions. Current models show non-trivial but limited self-modeling skill, and make systematic mistakes on simple counterfactual questions about their own behavior. To improve self-modeling skill, we develop a scalable synthetic-data pipeline that produces self-modeling training data, and show that reinforcement-learning can improve aggregate self-modeling skill across three open-source model families with some transfer to held-out tasks. These gains, however, do not seem to constitute introspection consistently: improved self-modeling may not arise from privileged access to the model's internal decision process.

Related

• Selective Deficits in LLM Mental Self-Modeling in a Behavior-Based Test of Theory of Mind
• Self-Referential Induction Increases Response Instability Relative to Unresolvable and Verifiable Questions in Large Language Models
• Decomposing Wrong-Consensus Agreement in LLM Self-Consistency: A GPT-4.1 Case Study

Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-09-01