Model Releases
FormalTCS: Benchmarking End-to-End Frontier Formal Theoretical Computer Science Research of Large Language Models
arXiv:2608.20153v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown growing potential for automated theoretical computer science (TCS) research, yet existing benchmarks remain far
arXiv:2608.20153v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown growing potential for automated theoretical computer science (TCS) research, yet existing benchmarks remain far from realistic research settings. We introduce ourbenchmark, an expert-validated benchmark for evaluating LLMs on frontier, end-to-end TCS research. ourbenchmark contains 175 instances drawn from papers accepted to STOC, FOCS, SODA, and COLT in 2025-2026, preserving paper-specific definitions, assumptions, and proof dependencies, with expert-verified Lean formalizations and proofs. Evaluations of leading LLMs reveal that current models remain far from reliably completing the full research pipeline. In particular, autoformalization is the sharpest bottleneck: the best model achieves only 11.5 on translating natural-language claims into formal theorem statements, compared with 28.6 Pass@8 when proving human-provided formal statements. Building on ourbenchmark, we further develop an automated TCS research framework that generates, formalizes, filters, and proves new claims. Of 64 generated claims, only 6 ultimately pass expert evaluation and proof verification, indicating that beyond formalization, limited research taste remains another major barrier to autonomous TCS research.
Related
- Benchmarking Testing in Automated Theorem Proving
- Evaluating the Formal Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models through Chomsky Hierarchy
- Right Answer, Wrong Method: Shortcut Hacking Misleads the Evaluation of LLM Reasoning on Frontier Science Benchmarks
- IMProofBench: Benchmarking AI on Research-Level Mathematical Proof Generation
Source: arXiv cs.CL | 2026-08-21