Local Ai
From Foundation Embeddings to Cropland Maps: Label Efficiency, Temporal Transferability and Independent Human Validation
arXiv:2609.17138v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Geospatial foundation models provide reusable representations of satellite imagery that support downstream mapping with limited task-specific modelling.
arXiv:2609.17138v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Geospatial foundation models provide reusable representations of satellite imagery that support downstream mapping with limited task-specific modelling. We evaluate whether annual AlphaEarth embeddings support binary cultivated-versus-non-cultivated mapping in Maine, USA, using 192 spatially separated patches and labels derived from the USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL). Without fine-tuning the foundation model, a lightweight classifier reaches 93.7% overall accuracy and 90.8% balanced accuracy on held-out patches. Logistic regression is within 0.3 percentage points of a gradient-boosted ensemble, while a nearest-class-centroid rule, which uses class centroids but fits no parameters, reaches 90.2%. A balanced sample of 60,000 labelled pixels is within 1.3 percentage points of the full pool of 8.6 million pixels; because pixels are spatially autocorrelated, this result concerns pixel-sample efficiency rather than 60,000 independent annotation sites. In a same-region transfer experiment, classifiers trained in one year remain accurate across 2018 to 2023. Against a blind, two-interpreter consensus at 385 randomly sampled points in one contiguous 2023 block, the AlphaEarth-plus-random-forest map agrees at 95.3% (kappa=0.82), compared with 91.7% for the CDL (kappa=0.72; exact two-sided McNemar p=0.0161). This local result is consistent with partial smoothing of CDL label noise, but it does not establish statewide correction of the reference product. On the same points, the difference from a fine-tuned TerraMind segmentation model is not statistically significant (95.3% versus 93.5%; p=0.14), and the experiment is not a controlled comparison of computational cost. These results support frozen geospatial embeddings as a low-compute candidate for regional cropland mapping, subject to the limits of a single-state study, a 30 m-derived training reference, and a one-block human validation.
Related
- Physically Typed and Geometry-Aware Representations for Earth Foundation Models
- From Coordinates to Candidate Regions: Temporal Change Localization via Region Selection in Remote Sensing Multimodal LLMs
- TempR1: Improving Temporal Understanding of MLLMs via Temporal-Aware Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning
- Embeddings based Anomaly Detection for Cleaning Global Crop Type Reference Datasets
Source: arXiv cs.CV | 2026-09-16