Model Releases
Function-Structured Reinforcement Learning with Executable Verifiers for Mathematical Reasoning
arXiv:2610.01729v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Algorithmic mathematical reasoning requires reliable decomposition, computation, and aggregation. Final-answer rewards provide limited guidance on inter
arXiv:2610.01729v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Algorithmic mathematical reasoning requires reliable decomposition, computation, and aggregation. Final-answer rewards provide limited guidance on intermediate errors, while successful execution does not guarantee mathematical correctness. This work proposes Function-Structured Graph Reinforcement Learning (FSG-RL), connecting subproblem graphs and Python implementations with multi-verifier feedback. The policy first learns to generate code from function graphs through supervised fine-tuning (SFT). Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) then optimizes the policy using answer-gated rewards and span-level credit assignment. The framework also supports teacher supervision and structured memory. A benchmark curated from Grade School Math 8K (GSM8K), MathQA, MATH, and Omni-MATH pairs public function graphs with private verification specifications. Under a unified evaluation protocol, GRPO improves final-answer accuracy from 43.25% to 67.50% and full solution success from 32.25% to 52.25% over SFT. Continued reinforcement learning (RL) with teacher supervision yields additional gains. The gains extend beyond producing correctly formatted code, supporting verifier-guided reinforcement learning for mathematical reasoning. Code is available at https://github.com/ZihanLiummyycc/FSG-RL.
Related
- Mat-Pref: Verifiable-Reward Training Improves Compositional Reasoning in Inorganic Materials
- LLMs Gaming Verifiers: RLVR can Lead to Reward Hacking
- When LLM Reward Design Fails: Diagnostic-Driven Refinement for Sparse Structured RL
- The Two-Hump Problem: Bridging the Difficulty Gap in Mathematical Reinforcement Learning
Source: arXiv cs.LG | 2026-10-02