Inkling-Small-276B-12B, effort 'max' VS Qwen3.6-27B

I saw u/danielhanchen's 1-bit Kimi K3 post: https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Kimi-K3-GGUF/discussions/12#6a6a4a90ec74ef13d85d7cf6 and decided to test Inkling-Small and Qwen3.6-27B myself, based on the full shared prompt: https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Kimi-K3-GGUF/discussions/12#6a6aba4da9b88c3996c80fa6 Inkling-Small-276B-12B, UD-Q2_K_XL, effort "max"(above "xhigh"), result: https://i.redd.it/v3hoyuo98ggh1.gif On DGX Spark GB10, it thought for 6 minutes and then started writing lots of hacky code: https://preview.redd.it/0in81v9jaggh1.png?width=927&format=png&auto=webp&s=b434eca3c34c8aba8333dd5462d46718c7c68718 It then dumped the file and wrote a short summary: https://preview.redd.it/d3u6x54egggh1.png?width=932&format=png&auto=webp&s=5cca9ef4bdd9105c98a904c6afaa2029bb286697 --- Qwen3.6-27B result: https://i.redd.it/rfcertf39ggh1.gif It thought for 38 seconds, realised it is a more complex task, so it wrote down the overall architecture plan and the key physics concepts/laws it should follow/implement: https://preview.redd.it/fmzebwusaggh1.png?width=927&format=png&auto=webp&s=fefc4b13a8bb763a9c75edab3307ff0791fbc37e It then got to working, creating classes, with an "update" method, similar to a game engine or UI framework https://preview.redd.it/db6z2e7vbggh1.png?width=927&format=png&auto=webp&s=77a3f50d0d92204871cc05d5cb10d1418fef50d1 After it finished, it checked that all the classes are there, critical functions, etc... https://preview.redd.it/lkcqt6r9cggh1.png?width=925&format=png&auto=webp&s=76ba519af2c1776126441eff36ffc3601bec09b0 Next it reviewed its own code: https://preview.redd.it/4ctsqh4ncggh1.png?width=928&format=png&auto=webp&s=194df4bb888ac1efb13da7912741ece39f3d992d https://preview.redd.it/livh5n2jeggh1.png?width=928&format=png&auto=webp&s=4e7f8b08b4e9e55f08922b4c09f5670accc1c919 Next checked again if all HTML tags are opened/closed correctly and all the JavaScript parenthesis and brackets are opened/closed correctly as well. https://preview.redd.it/ql8r9fzseggh1.png?width=925&format=png&auto=webp&s=76349c3d8367102ca4436cf540442a5640b595f2 Reviewed again and made more fixes: https://preview.redd.it/w0i096msdggh1.png?width=926&format=png&auto=webp&s=07834b77f732b6e597eb6dffe7a7d80ea92e7f88 One last time checked whether all the requested features were implemented: https://preview.redd.it/4ec1bb16eggh1.png?width=929&format=png&auto=webp&s=9732c938824178d70b8e649b3f17dad6c3a8ff17 Checked -> the feature was there under a different name. Printed the file path and size and then this final report: https://preview.redd.it/c5xks9jffggh1.png?width=932&format=png&auto=webp&s=2a031d4ab2422d86c6fbbfe1c38a273eae483370 submitted by /u/lilian_moraru [link] [comments]

Related

• LocalLLaMA post tier list
• Bonsai 27B: 1-bit dense LLM running locally in your browser using custom WebGPU kernels
• Has anyone experimented with stabilizing low quant models with lower temp and top p?

Source: r/LocalLLaMA | 2026-07-30