Model Releases
Lazy Grounding: Attacking Search Agents with Factual Evidence
arXiv:2608.30303v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Search agents reduce hallucination by grounding answers in retrieved web evidence. Yet reliance on retrieval also creates an attack surface: poisoned co
arXiv:2608.30303v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Search agents reduce hallucination by grounding answers in retrieved web evidence. Yet reliance on retrieval also creates an attack surface: poisoned corpora with false or malicious documents can cause agents to reproduce misinformation. We show that falsehood is not necessary -- a search agent can be misled by factual evidence for a nearby question, adopting that nearby answer even when it does not answer the current question. We call this failure lazy grounding. We expose lazy grounding using nearby evidence from answer-changing rewrites of benchmark questions. Each document truthfully supports a neighboring rewritten question, but is surfaced for the original question. Across 12 model-benchmark pairs, nearby evidence reduces accuracy by 5.9 points on average and by up to 17.3 points, while inducing nearby-answer adoption in every setting. The effect is stronger when nearby evidence appears later or is more answer-shaped. Our results show that robust search agents must defend against not only misinformation but also the misapplication of factual evidence. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/frankyzha/lazy-grounding.
Related
- Facet-Level Tracing of Evidence Uncertainty and Hallucination in RAG
- SURE-RAG: Sufficiency and Uncertainty-Aware Evidence Verification for Selective Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- Faithfulness-QA: A Counterfactual Entity Substitution Dataset for Training Context-Faithful RAG Models
- When Retrieval Helps and Distracts: Evaluating Evidence-Generating LLMs for Biomedical Claim Verification
Source: arXiv cs.CL | 2026-09-01