Tutorials
Learning Counterfactual World Models for Embodied Reasoning under Partial Observability
arXiv:2609.05834v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: World models promise a general route to embodied intelligence: learn predictive dynamics once, then reason, plan, and act with them. Increasingly, the r
arXiv:2609.05834v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: World models promise a general route to embodied intelligence: learn predictive dynamics once, then reason, plan, and act with them. Increasingly, the representations beneath such models are pretrained on large-scale video, interaction, and multimodal corpora, which raises a question prediction quality alone cannot answer: when is a learned representation actually actionable? We identify a failure mode we call counterfactual collapse: a model predicts visually plausible futures while failing to distinguish interventions with different behavioral consequences. This arises whenever a representation is optimized for perceptual similarity rather than intervention structure, which is precisely the objective under which most large-scale pretrained encoders are learned. We introduce Counterfactual Latent World Models (CLWM), which combine a recurrent belief-state encoder, action-conditioned latent dynamics, and a contrastive counterfactual objective that separates futures induced by distinct interventions even when their observations look alike. Across occluded manipulation, aliased navigation, and long-horizon manipulation, CLWM improves planning success over the strongest baseline (65.1% o 74.6% on Occluded Push and 67.3% o 78.9% on Aliased Maze) and reduces exploitative planning failures (18.4% o 9.7% on Deferred Kitchen), with ablations attributing the gains to hard counterfactual negatives, especially perceptual-alias negatives. Finally, our counterfactual separability metric, which tracks planning success across the five baseline model classes (r ge 0.94), is representation-agnostic: given intervention-outcome labels, it can audit any encoder, pretrained or trained from scratch, before a planner trusts it. We do not yet measure it on large-scale pretrained encoders. Here we establish the metric and its relationship to planning success for world models trained from scratch.
Related
- SJEPA: Learning Elegant Latent Dynamics with Hybrid Symbolic-Neural Predictors
- Towards general embodied intelligence: integrating large language models, knowledge bases, and reasoning capabilities to build the next generation of AI agents
- Temporal-Distance JEPA: Plan-Aware Representation Learning for Latent World Model Predictive Control
- A Definition and Roadmap for World Models
- Graph World Models: Concepts, Taxonomy, and Future Directions
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-09-10