Local Ai
Learning to Cover Locally: Graph Neural Combinatorial Optimization under a Hard Information Horizon
arXiv:2610.00422v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural combinatorial optimization typically assumes a centralized solver that reads the whole instance. We study the opposite: combinatorial optimizat
arXiv:2610.00422v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural combinatorial optimization typically assumes a centralized solver that reads the whole instance. We study the opposite: combinatorial optimization under a hard information horizon, where every node commits to its share of a global solution seeing only its k-hop neighborhood, and those commitments must compose into a globally feasible solution. We formalize this as local set cover and instantiate it on weighted multipoint relay (MPR) selection, the NP-hard 2-hop covering problem of the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) routing protocol (RFC7181), whose horizon is imposed by the protocol, not chosen by the modeler. We prove two results. Any deterministic selector whose horizon is one hop short must either fail coverage or land a factor Delta from optimal, and an L-layer graph neural network (GNN) read out at the deciding node is exactly an L-hop selector, so capacity cannot buy back radius. Conversely, at the horizon a ac{GNN} of depth O(Delta) reproduces the RFC7181 covering greedy, and at width O(c_{max}Delta) its metric-aware weighted analogue, inheriting the (1+lnDelta_2)-approximation in both cases. Empirically, a 3-layer ac{GATv2} with a coverage-completing decoder, behavior-cloned from the CP-SAT optimum, reaches ext{cost}/ext{opt}=1.030pm0.001 against greedy's 1.138, closing 79.1% of the gap at 100% coverage. Restricting the same learner to one hop, on identical instances with the same decoder and demonstrations, collapses it to 1.344, far worse than greedy. Two transfer checks target real-world networks. OLSRv2's unmodified selection code matches our cardinality greedy on 200/200 unit-cost instances, and on 40{,}308 instances of real battalion mobility the frozen model closes 48% of the gap at full coverage. The information horizon, not the model capacity, is the most significant variable.
Related
- Learning to Execute Graph Algorithms Exactly with Graph Neural Networks
- Graph Neural Networks are Heuristics
- Unrealized Expectations: Comparing AI Methods vs Classical Algorithms for Maximum Independent Set
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-10-02