(Old)Pro plan: 5.3flash, v4.1flash, 0731 confusion regarding usages

Hello, I'm at the old pro plan. With the upcoming cloud model retirement of deepseek v4 0731 flash in mind because 4.1 is supposed to be more efficient while providing even better results I remembered a test of mine from last week. I tested 4.1 flash and noticed it consumes so much more usage. So I went back to glm 5.3 flash. Took some quick screenshots, dumped it into my notebook and left. https://preview.redd.it/wiznigb8x1qh1.png?width=929&format=png&auto=webp&s=7bea60272d69526f6dcb3be8f2625900899e85e1 It was mostly the same usecase with hermes or pi. They might have changed this since then but I stopped using deepseek v4.1 flash after seeing it consumed more than 5.3 flash while dont provide substentially better answers for my case. Can someone replicate this? Is this because of the old pro plan? Or is the total numbers of requests not comparable because they might have changed the measurement of newer models to token based even though Im at the old plan? submitted by /u/No_Drop_6901 [link] [comments]

Related

• How is Deepseek v4 flash 0731 running on Ollama cloud?
• I subscribed to Ollama Pro today. deepseek-v4-flash:0731 works great and serves as a solid alternative, and glm-5.3-flash:cloud works fine as well.
• Will Ollama come out with a non-cloud version of Deepseek-v4 Flash?
• Will ollama upgrade Deepseek V4 Flash on cloud?

Source: r/ollama | 2026-09-17