Peer Influence across Heterogeneous AI Models

arXiv:2610.03095v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When two AI agents disagree, who persuades whom? As multi-agent systems increasingly combine language models of different families and sizes, the answer can determine which judgments survive interaction. Measuring persuasion as the probabilistic shift in an agent's decision after a single exchange with a dissenting peer, we test seven open-weight models across three language understanding tasks. We find that persuasion is strong: when models disagree, receivers often abandon their initial judgment after seeing a peer's answer and explanation. Surprisingly, however, neither standalone certainty nor model scale reliably predicts persuasion dynamics. Models producing almost perfectly consistent decisions in isolation can be among the most susceptible to persuasion, and small models can match larger ones as persuaders and resist their influence just as effectively. Furthermore, we show that the size of the shift depends more on the susceptibility of the listener than on the persuasiveness of the speaker. Persuasion patterns are therefore specific to each model pairing, with heterogeneity amplifying persuasion in some combinations and suppressing it in others, allowing a dissenting agent running a small model to overturn the judgments of a much larger one. These findings show that the behavior of interacting models cannot be inferred from their individual properties but must be evaluated in the combinations in which they will operate.

Related

• Easier to Mislead Than to Correct: Harmful and Beneficial Revision in LLM Conformity
• When Numbers Start Talking: Numerical Signalling and Strategic Behaviour Among LLMs
• How does Adversarial Influence Scale in Multi-Agent Systems?
• Agent-as-Peer-Debriefer: A Multi-Agent Framework with Perspective-Based Refinement for Qualitative Analysis
• Mo' Models, Mo' Problems: How to best select model pools when designing Multi-Agent Systems

Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-10-05