PhysElite: How Far Are LLMs from Solving Olympiad-Level Physics Problems?

arXiv:2608.25097v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Understanding how (multimodal) large language models perform on physics problems requires benchmarks that reflect the difficulty and breadth of expert-level physical reasoning. Existing physics benchmarks remain limited in the following two important ways: (1) short of high-difficulty datasets, and (2) lack of comprehensive coverage of visual forms, knowledge points, and step-by-step solution processes. As a result, model performance on current datasets may not be fully representative of their ability to solve complex physics problems. To address these issues, we present PhysElite, a large-scale bilingual multimodal benchmark for Olympiad-level physics reasoning. PhysElite contains 11,586 Olympiad-tier problems. For each problem, we provide corresponding visual diagrams, step-by-step bilingual Chinese-English solution derivations, and the final answer. We benchmark 18 open-source and closed-source MLLMs, and find that even the strongest model reaches only 33.7% answer accuracy. We additionally conduct step-level process evaluation to diagnose where models fail in the reasoning chain. Our datasets are released at https://huggingface.co/datasets/physelite/PhysElite.

Related

• PolyBridgeBench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs for Physics-Grounded Bridge Design
• Understanding Axes of Difficulty For Long Context Tasks Via PredicateLongBench
• LiveMathematicianBench: A Live Benchmark for Research-Level Mathematical Reasoning with Proof Sketches
• Xpertbench: Expert Level Tasks with Rubrics-Based Evaluation

Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-09-28