Model Releases
Predicting Where Steering Vectors Succeed
arXiv:2604.15557v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Steering vectors work for some concepts and layers but fail for others, and practitioners have no way to predict which setting applies before running
arXiv:2604.15557v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Steering vectors work for some concepts and layers but fail for others, and practitioners have no way to predict which setting applies before running an intervention. We introduce the Linear Accessibility Profile (LAP), a per-layer diagnostic that repurposes the logit lens as a predictor of steering vector effectiveness. The key measure, A_{lin}, applies the model's unembedding matrix to intermediate hidden states, requiring no training. Across 24 controlled binary concept families on five models (Pythia-2.8B to Llama-8B), peak A_{lin} predicts steering effectiveness at rho = +0.86 to +0.91 and layer selection at rho = +0.63 to +0.92. A three-regime framework explains when difference-of-means steering works, when nonlinear methods are needed, and when no method can work. An entity-steering demo confirms the prediction end-to-end: steering at the LAP-recommended layer redirects completions on Gemma-2-2B and OLMo-2-1B-Instruct, while the middle layer (the standard heuristic) has no effect on either model.
Source: arXiv cs.CL | 2026-04-20