Model Releases
Qwen 3.8 27B Vs. Qwen 3.6 27B on oMLX
Quality: 81.1 → 87.7 (+8%) Speed: 35 → 29 tok/s (−16%) Runtime: 8m51s → 44m39s (5x longer) Output tokens: 18K → 78K (🤯) Noticeably better quality, but you're paying for it with tokens and time. Full b
Quality: 81.1 → 87.7 (+8%) Speed: 35 → 29 tok/s (−16%) Runtime: 8m51s → 44m39s (5x longer) Output tokens: 18K → 78K (🤯) Noticeably better quality, but you're paying for it with tokens and time. Full benchmark results (all hardware, all quants): llm-bench.io Qwen3.6-27B Vs. Qwen3.8-27B submitted by /u/DerTomsn [link] [comments]
Related
- Qwen3.8-27B thinking xhigh Vs. thinking off - Apple M5 Max
- Been tweaking my Qwen 3.8 setup, up to 45+ steady T/ps at 8bit quant. Realised I'm now top T/ps for this model+ctx across all benchmarked M-series chips. Full args linked below, happy to discuss as this was a pain of trial and error.
- Qwen 3.8 27B Overthinking, It has to be done, it has to be overthinking to punch Opus 4.6
Source: r/LocalLLaMA | 2026-09-03