Model Releases

Qwen company already rushed out a Jev competitor. No open weights yet.

EDIT: About that, I tried it out, and it's garbage so far. I did some basic tests through AIHubMix (do not use that platform btw, it's trash), and my agent did some comparison. I guess it figures, it

DGX agentreddit
model-releasesr-localllama

EDIT: About that, I tried it out, and it's garbage so far. I did some basic tests through AIHubMix (do not use that platform btw, it's trash), and my agent did some comparison. I guess it figures, it was a model they released just days after the Jev hype started. The agent's analysis is below: AI Agent's output: I thoroughly tested https://aihubmix.com/v1/systemone using the provided API key and decision-model-preview across latency, throughput, and linguistic judgment accuracy against our test suite. Here are the test results and why I strongly recommend NOT switching to this endpoint yet: ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Latency & Rate Limit Benchmark Server-side execution: The endpoint reports latency_ms: ~130ms–160ms. Total Round-Trip (network + TLS): Averaged 644.9 ms (ranging from 473ms up to 882ms). By comparison, your existing local router ([9router IP]) averages ~439 ms. Hard 16-Question Ceiling: The proxy strictly rejects requests with more than 16 questions: {"error": {"message": "questions: 19 exceeds the limit of 16", "type": "Aihubmix_api_error"}} On longer Japanese sentences (e.g. 外に出してやってくれませんか。 or ちょっと聞いてみたいんだけど。), our parallel diagnostic tensor sends 19–22 questions, which throws an immediate 400 Bad Request. Aggressive Rate Limiting: Even with a 1-second pause between sequential requests, it frequently triggered 429 Too Many Requests. ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Quality of Judgments (Major Semantic Degradation) To test quality, I adapted our test battery into a compact 10-question payload to stay under the 16-question limit. Across the benchmark, decision-model-preview exhibited severe calibration collapse: Test Case 1: Indefinite Pronoun vs. Wh-word Japanese: 何か待ってるの? ("Are you waiting for something?") User Draft: "what are you waiting for" (Clear grammatical error: confuses yes/no 何か with open 何) Local Router (oc/jev-1.13-free): is_flawless: 0.07 (correctly marked false) grade_bracket: 5_moderate_error (confidence 0.98) sentence_critique_summary: confused_indefinite_with_wh_word (confidence 0.96) Result: Accurately docks to 5–6/10 and explains the question-type mismatch. Aihubmix (decision-model-preview): is_flawless: 0.98 (marked true!) grade_bracket: 10_flawless sentence_critique_summary: no_flaws_accurate Result: Completely failed to detect the grammatical error and awarded a false 10/10. Test Case 2: Benefactive Direction Reversal Japanese: 外に出してやってくれませんか。 ("Could you let him/the pet out?") User Draft: "would you let me outside?" (Critical reversal: favor for someone else vs. oneself) Local Router: grade_bracket: 3_major_error (4/10) benefactive_direction: recipient_reversed_self_vs_other Aihubmix: is_flawless: 0.83 grade_bracket: 10_flawless sentence_critique_summary: no_flaws_accurate ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Summary & Recommendation Model Calibration is Inferior: Whatever model or snapshot is currently mapped to decision-model-preview on Aihubmix appears to be an uncalibrated or older preview checkpoint. It fails on the exact Japanese linguistic subtleties (benefactives, wh-scope, modality) that we carefully tuned. Artificial Constraints: The hard 16-question limit and 429 rate limiter break our dynamic sentence-chunking architecture. Current Setup is Superior: Your local router (http://[9router IP]/v1 running oc/jev-1.13-free) is ~200ms faster, has no question caps, never rate-limits, and correctly diagnoses complex Japanese grammar. Recommendation: Keep the current endpoint (http://[9router IP]/v1) active. If you still want the script modified to allow switching providers via settings or want to test it anyway, let me know and I can make the Jev endpoint independently configurable in the UI settings dialog. Original Post: It's called decision-model-preview. There is only a docs page. No announcement or anything. I can't post a link because reddit's filters just deletes posts that contain a link to the cloud platform that hosts it. But you'll find the page if you Google the model name. submitted by /u/pneuny [link] [comments]

Related

Source: r/LocalLLaMA | 2026-09-27

Loading related sources…