Model Releases
Qwen3.6 35B (2 min) vs Muse Glimmer 30B (4 min) on custom Llama.cpp build (RTX 5080)
Muse Glimmer 30B feels significantly more precise and reliable, it almost never drops the ball or breaks rules. However, its designs lack creative depth and richness. Qwen3.6 35B, on the other hand, i
Muse Glimmer 30B feels significantly more precise and reliable, it almost never drops the ball or breaks rules. However, its designs lack creative depth and richness. Qwen3.6 35B, on the other hand, is prone to more occasional blunders/hallucinations, but its creative output is superior. It generates far richer, more complex voxel worlds and offers higher design quality. LLama.ccp Build Provenance: Base: llama.cpp upstream (merge 4445f8d, build 661) CUDA Toolkit 13.1 + MSVC 19.44 + sm_120a-real (native Blackwell PTX) Flags: GGML_CUDA=ON, GGML_CUDA_FA=ON, GGML_CUDA_FA_ALL_QUANTS=ON, GGML_CUDA_GRAPHS=ON, GGML_NATIVE=OFF License: MIT (upstream llama.cpp) Do you think Qwen3.6 is still the undisputed king here? submitted by /u/myanimal22 [link] [comments]
Related
- Local Benchmark : Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen 3.6 27B vs Gemma4 31B (and many other models and finetunes)
- Tested in Coding: BF16 Muse Glimmer vs BF16 Qwen3.6 27B
Source: r/LocalLLaMA | 2026-08-12