Model Releases
Reference-Based Bias Detection in LLMs via Relative Representations of Hidden States
arXiv:2609.10060v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing bias auditing methods typically rely on model outputs, requiring costly benchmarks or judge models and potentially missing internal shifts that
arXiv:2609.10060v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing bias auditing methods typically rely on model outputs, requiring costly benchmarks or judge models and potentially missing internal shifts that never appear in generated text. We propose a reference-based method that audits bias in hidden-state representations across related model variants, for example before and after fine-tuning. Because fine-tuning reshapes representation geometry, absolute hidden states are not directly comparable, so we encode each sentence by its similarities to a fixed set of anchor sentences, yielding relative representations in a shared comparison space. There we measure how target groups shift in their association with positive and negative attributes, a quantity we call the Representational Bias Shift Delta B. Across three model families and the WildGuardMix, DecodingTrust and ToxiGen benchmarks, Delta B correlates with output-level bias change in 15 of the 18 settings we test, reaching |r| = 0.84 (p < 0.001) under full fine-tuning and becoming more model-dependent under parameter-efficient adaptation. Thresholding Delta B detects checkpoints whose bias increased with ROC AUC between 0.65 and 0.99, and on WildGuardMix and DecodingTrust it separates them better than a SEAT-based baseline for all three families. Delta B is also stable under changes to the anchor set, attribute sets and target templates. Our method requires no task-specific evaluation data and audits a model in about three minutes, using 3-50imes less compute than the output-level benchmarks considered here. We view it as complementary to output-based auditing rather than a replacement for it.
Related
- Interpreting Language Model Hidden States at Scale
- A Multi-Domain Red Teaming Framework for Safety, Robustness, and Fairness Evaluation of Medical Large Language Models
- Unequal Verdicts: Investigating Gender Bias in LLM-Based Fake News Detection
- Insidious by Design: Implications of Large Language Model algorithmic bias for the Global South
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-09-11