Model Releases
Reliability Stress Tests and Decision-Time Routing for Chest X-ray Vision-Language Models
arXiv:2610.02270v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical vision-language model (VLM) evaluation is sensitive to workflow design, prompting strategy, and benchmark construction, yet most studies treat
arXiv:2610.02270v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical vision-language model (VLM) evaluation is sensitive to workflow design, prompting strategy, and benchmark construction, yet most studies treat these factors in isolation. We introduce a reliability stress test for chest X-ray interpretation built on two balanced datasets (a private report-backed set and a curated MIMIC subset). Three medical VLMs (CheXagent, MedGemma-4B, and MedGemma-27B) are evaluated across three prompt styles and two workflows (single-VLM and multi-agent), producing 36 configurations. We show that exact-match accuracy alone can overstate the effectiveness of conservative models that default to "Normal" predictions. Diagnostic reliability also depends heavily on model family and scale: multi-agent reasoning helps some configurations but hurts others. Building on these observations, we propose a decision-time routing framework that selectively escalates to multi-agent inference only when beneficial, improving the cost-quality trade-off over fixed workflows. Our results highlight the need for evaluation protocols that jointly consider prompt sensitivity, failure-mode diversity, and workflow choice before clinical deployment.
Related
- Beyond Benchmark Scores: Auditing Medical Vision-Language Models for Chest X-Ray Tuberculosis Screening
- Translating Inference-Time Control to Radiology Vision-Language Models: Activation Steering for Pneumonia Classification on Chest X-rays
- CheXpercept: A Benchmark for Evaluating Expert-Level Lesion Perception in Chest X-rays
- SPARC-Rad: A Multimodal Benchmark Dataset and Evaluation Pipeline for Spatial and Anatomical Reasoning in Radiology Vision-Language Models
Source: arXiv cs.CV | 2026-10-05