SafeCRS: Personalized Safety Alignment for LLM-Based Conversational Recommender Systems

arXiv:2603.03536v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Current LLM-based conversational recommender systems (CRS) primarily optimize recommendation accuracy and user satisfaction. We identify an underexplored vulnerability in which recommendation outputs may negatively impact users by violating personalized safety constraints, when individualized safety sensitivities -- such as trauma triggers, self-harm history, or phobias -- are implicitly inferred from the conversation but not respected during recommendation. We formalize this challenge as personalized CRS safety and introduce SafeRec, a new benchmark dataset designed to systematically evaluate safety risks in LLM-based CRS under user-specific constraints. To further address this problem, we propose SafeCRS, a safety-aware training framework that integrates Safe Supervised Fine-Tuning (Safe-SFT) with Safe Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization (Safe-GDPO) to jointly optimize recommendation quality and personalized safety alignment. Extensive experiments on SafeRec demonstrate that SafeCRS reduces safety violation rates by up to 96.5% relative to the strongest recommendation-quality baseline while maintaining competitive recommendation quality. Warning: This paper contains potentially harmful and offensive content.

Related

• Aligning Deep Implicit Preferences by Learning to Reason Defensively
• Safety Is Not Universal: The Selective Safety Trap in LLM Alignment
• NRT-Bench: Benchmarking Multi-Turn Red-Teaming of LLM Operator Agents in Safety-Critical Control Rooms
• Breaking Safety at the Token Boundary: How BPE Tokenization Creates Exploitable Gaps in LLM Alignment

Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-07-28