SARC-DQ: Runtime Data-Quality Gating for Agentic AI: Silent Evidence Defects, the Incompetence Shield, and Downstream-Only Remediation

arXiv:2607.26313v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic systems act, so a defect in the evidence they retrieve becomes a wrong action with a currency cost. The most dangerous enterprise defects are metadata-borne: a stale price or a superseded record, perfectly well-formed in the payload and betrayed only by freshness, lineage, or provenance. Such a defect never enters the agent's context, and an agent cannot doubt data it cannot see. On a priced replenishment benchmark, a competent agent silently converts an injected metadata-borne defect into a costly action about 60% of the time, with zero data-quality flags and behavioral doubt markers at chance (AUC <= 0.50). Across four model tiers spanning roughly 15x in inference price, the rate stays flat: capability does not buy skepticism. A metadata-aware pre-action gate with downstream-only remediation recovers the loss fully on the signals its predicates cover and not at all on those they miss. A model-free oracle derived from the task's decision geometry tracks the measured rates with MAE 0.015 (Pearson r = 0.876, interval coverage 15/16 cells), giving the flat ladder an analytical form. Evidence integrity is a systems axis distinct from model capability; mitigation depends on enforcement placement and predicate coverage. Code, frozen results, and a deterministic analysis pipeline: https://github.com/besanson/dqSarc

Related

• Stateful Guardrails for Multi-Turn LLM Systems: A Conversational Risk Accumulation Framework
• ContraFix: Agentic Vulnerability Repair via Differential Runtime Evidence and Skill Reuse
• Towards Agentic Runtime Healing
• Benchmarks are Not Enough: RAMP for Runtime Assessing of Agentic Models in Production Systems
• CAVA: Canonical Action Verification and Attestation for Runtime Governance of Agentic AI Systems

Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-07-31