Model Releases
Spectral Edge Dynamics Reveal Functional Modes of Learning
arXiv:2604.06256v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Training dynamics during grokking concentrate along a small number of dominant update directions -- the spectral edge -- which reliably distinguishes
arXiv:2604.06256v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Training dynamics during grokking concentrate along a small number of dominant update directions -- the spectral edge -- which reliably distinguishes grokking from non-grokking regimes. We show that standard mechanistic interpretability tools (head attribution, activation probing, sparse autoencoders) fail to capture these directions: their structure is not localized in parameter or feature space. Instead, each direction induces a structured function over the input domain, revealing low-dimensional functional modes invisible to representation-level analysis. For modular addition, all leading directions collapse to a single Fourier mode. For multiplication, the same collapse appears only in the discrete-log basis, yielding a 5.9x improvement in concentration. For subtraction, the edge spans a small multi-mode family. For $x^2+y^2$, no single harmonic basis suffices, but cross-terms of additive and multiplicative features provide a 4x variance boost, consistent with the decomposition (a+b)^2 - 2ab. Multitask training amplifies this compositional structure, with the $x^2+y^2$ spectral edge inheriting the addition circuit's characteristic frequency (2.3x concentration increase). These results suggest that training discovers low-dimensional functional modes over the input domain, whose structure depends on the algebraic symmetry of the task. These results suggest that spectral edge dynamics identify low-dimensional functional subspaces governing learning, whose representation depends on the algebraic structure of the task. Simple harmonic structure emerges only when the task admits a symmetry-adapted basis; more complex tasks require richer functional descriptions.
Related
- The Stepwise Informativeness Assumption: Why are Entropy Dynamics and Reasoning Correlated in LLMs?
- Information as Structural Alignment: A Dynamical Theory of Continual Learning
- Infusion: Shaping Model Behavior by Editing Training Data via Influence Functions
- Quantitative Estimation of Target Task Performance from Unsupervised Pretext Task in Semi/Self-Supervised Learning
Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-04-10