Agents
Spiking Neural Networks for Energy-Efficient Object Detection in Forward-Looking Sonar Imagery
arXiv:2608.22072v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) are increasingly important tools in industries ranging from research, to energy, to defense. AUVs are power-constr
arXiv:2608.22072v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) are increasingly important tools in industries ranging from research, to energy, to defense. AUVs are power-constrained platforms operating in remote environments with fixed battery capacities, where propulsion competes with compute and sensors for power over lengthy mission durations. AUVs frequently operate in dark or turbid waters where optical sensing is of limited value, and rely on sonar as their primary sensing modality. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are the state-of-the-art solution for object detection in forward-looking sonar imagery, but are energy expensive (e.g. YOLOv8m: 322 mJ/inference). Spiking neural networks (SNNs) rely on binary spike activations and thus sparse accumulate-only operations, allowing them to be remarkably energy efficient, particularly when paired with dedicated neuromorphic hardware. The sparse, high-contrast structure of forward-looking sonar (FLS) returns is structurally matched to spike coding in a way that optical imagery is not. No prior work has assessed the suitability of SNNs for object detection in FLS imagery. SpikeYOLO, a fully spiking network trained with surrogate gradients, was benchmarked against state-of-the-art CNN baselines on three FLS object detection datasets. Key results: SpikeYOLO T=2 achieves 3.3imes lower theoretical compute energy on UATD (97 vs 322 mJ) at competitive accuracy (0.529 mAP@0.5:0.95 vs. YOLOv8m's 0.575); SpikeYOLO matches YOLOv8m on mAP@0.5 and outperforms YOLO-SONAR and Fast R-CNN baselines on the sparse Marine-Debris-FLS dataset at 4.4imes lower energy; SpikeYOLO demonstrates superior robustness to multiplicative speckle noise (3.0% degradation at sigma{=}0.4 vs. 8.9% for YOLOv8m), outperforming YOLOv8m outright at sigma{=}0.6, directly relevant to real-world FLS deployment.
Source: arXiv cs.CV | 2026-08-25