Model Releases

STAGE: Controlled Objective Admission for Multi-Preference LLM Alignment

arXiv:2608.16553v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-preference alignment is often framed as scalarization: combine reward dimensions, then optimize. This leaves a temporal decision underspecified: w

DGX agentpaper
model-releasesarxiv-cs-cl

arXiv:2608.16553v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-preference alignment is often framed as scalarization: combine reward dimensions, then optimize. This leaves a temporal decision underspecified: when should each preference dimension enter policy optimization? We propose methodname, a stability-guided active-set controller for controlled objective admission. methodname starts from a small active set, retains admitted objectives, and expands when reward-deviation gates indicate low recent deviation or a patience budget is exhausted. A probing phase estimates a hard-to-easy order, and adaptive weighting emphasizes underperforming active dimensions. Automatic evaluations with 15 training preferences and 16 held-out benchmark columns show that methodname obtains higher averages than simultaneous scalarization and shared-budget adapted baselines. Component ablations and expansion dynamics further support cumulative retention, gated admission, and probing-derived ordering as useful design choices in this setting. These results position objective-entry timing as a concrete control variable in reward-vector RLHF.

Source: arXiv cs.CL | 2026-08-18

Loading related sources…