Model Releases

Talk is (Not) Cheap: A Taxonomy and Benchmark Coverage Audit for LLM Attacks

arXiv:2605.15118v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce a reusable framework for auditing whether LLM attack benchmarks collectively cover the threat surface: a 4imes6 Target imes Technique mat

DGX agentpaper
model-releasesarxiv-cs-cl

arXiv:2605.15118v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce a reusable framework for auditing whether LLM attack benchmarks collectively cover the threat surface: a 4imes6 Target imes Technique matrix grounded in STRIDE, constructed from a 507-leaf taxonomy -- 401 data-populated and 106 threat-model-derived leaves -- of inference-time attacks extracted from 932 arXiv security studies (2023--2026). The matrix enables benchmark-external validation -- auditing collective coverage rather than individual benchmark consistency. Applying it to six public benchmarks reveals that the three primary frameworks (HarmBench, InjecAgent, AgentDojo) occupy non-overlapping cells covering at most 25% of the matrix, while entire STRIDE threat categories (Service Disruption, Model Internals) lack any standardized evaluation, despite published attacks in these categories achieving 46imes token amplification and 96% attack success rates through mechanisms which no benchmark tests. The corpus of 2,521 unique attack groups further reveals pervasive naming fragmentation (up to 29 surface forms for a single attack) and heavy concentration in Safety & Alignment Bypass, structural properties invisible at smaller scale. The taxonomy, attack records, and coverage mappings are released as extensible artifacts; as new benchmarks emerge, they can be mapped onto the same matrix, enabling the community to track whether evaluation gaps are closing.

Source: arXiv cs.CL | 2026-05-15

Loading related sources…