The implication is that you should be using AI for peer review, but combine it with humans, though AI reviewers keep getting better and huma…

The post discusses how AI can be effectively used for peer review processes when combined with human reviewers, while noting that AI's capabilities in this area continue to improve. It implies that hybrid human-AI review approaches may represent a practical middle ground as AI systems become increasingly sophisticated at evaluating academic or professional work. The suggestion is that organizations should consider integrating AI tools into peer review workflows rather than relying solely on either humans or automated systems alone.

Source: Ethan Mollick (X) | 2026-05-21