Industry
the openai hugging face incident gets cited a lot but what about the detail where they had to use GLM 5.2 to analyze the attack because the …
The tweet reports on a widely‑cited incident involving OpenAI and Hugging Face, noting that analysts had to use the open‑source GLM 5.2 model to investigate an attack because OpenAI’s proprietary “saf
The tweet reports on a widely‑cited incident involving OpenAI and Hugging Face, noting that analysts had to use the open‑source GLM 5.2 model to investigate an attack because OpenAI’s proprietary “safe” models were unable to perform the analysis. The post includes timestamps formatted for local time zones but primarily highlights the reliance on GLM 5.2 due to restrictions on the safe models.
Related
- Hugging Face CEO Clément Delangue weighs in on the open-weight AI models debate and said it helped the company when it was hacked by an Open…
- This was our first incident of this kind, and we want to thank OpenAI for its transparency about what happened and for the collaboration. Fo…
- .@huggingface CEO @ClementDelangue says a hack by OpenAI could have been 'way worse' if not for the company's defensive measures. He speaks …
- I recommend going back and reading the Huggingface incident report post from last Thursday, before they knew it was a rogue OpenAI model
Source: Clem Delangue (X) | 2026-09-12