TSQueryBench: LLM-as-a-Judge for Time Series Explanations

arXiv:2604.02118v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Natural language explanations of time series data are increasingly produced by foundation models in high stakes domains, making factual correctness critical. Evaluating such explanations differs fundamentally from standard natural language generation: correctness requires verifying numerical claims against structured data rather than similarity to reference text. While LLM as a Judge has emerged as a scalable paradigm for text evaluation, its applicability to numerically grounded time series explanations remains unstudied. We introduce TSQueryBench, a controlled synthetic benchmark of 500 time series instances across 10 query types, each paired with correct, partially correct, and incorrect explanations. We evaluate six large language models across four tasks: explanation generation, relative ranking, independent scoring, and multi anomaly detection. Our central finding is a consistent generation evaluation asymmetry: models that fail to generate numerically correct explanations nonetheless reliably identify or score correct ones. These results show that rubric guided LLM evaluation is substantially more reliable than generation for time series reasoning, supporting LLM judges as scalable evaluators in numerically grounded settings. Code and data: https://github.com/Prxxthxm/TSQueryBench/

Related

• Can Large Language Models Adequately Perform Symbolic Reasoning Over Time Series?
• TimeSage-EV: A Live Benchmark for Agentic Time Series Analysis in Evolving Environments
• TimeSage-MT: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Evaluating Agentic Time Series Reasoning

Source: arXiv cs.AI | 2026-08-19