Model Releases
Understanding Clinical Cognitive Dialogues Using Large Language Models
arXiv:2609.34125v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In-person cognitive assessment is both a test and an interaction. Clinicians explain tasks, repair misunderstandings, and adapt to patient responses
arXiv:2609.34125v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In-person cognitive assessment is both a test and an interaction. Clinicians explain tasks, repair misunderstandings, and adapt to patient responses, while patients may hesitate, seek clarification, or disengage. Yet clinical dialogue resources rarely label the interaction structure needed to study these behaviors at scale. We present an de-identified corpus of 33 cognitive assessment conversations with 8,250 utterances annotated for three speaker roles and 56 dialogue acts. We use this corpus to benchmark large language models on fine-grained dialogue-act classification and next-patient-utterance generation. We also test whether out-of-domain instruction data and explanation-augmented training transfer to this clinical setting. Instruction tuning produces the strongest patient-utterance reference matching and improves classification accuracy. Reasoning-aware fine-tuning produces the strongest classification results among the LLaMA-3.1-8B variants. However, even the best models struggle to separate closely related dialogue acts, showing that broad conversational intent is easier to recognize than fine-grained communicative function. The corpus and benchmark make interaction structure measurable in cognitive assessments and support follow-up work on conversational markers, clinician education, and carefully validated simulated patients. This work does not make diagnostic claims. Instead, it provides the data and evaluation framework needed to study these applications.
Related
- CounselBench: A Large-Scale Expert Evaluation and Adversarial Benchmarking of Large Language Models in Mental Health Question Answering
- MentalBench: A DSM-Grounded Benchmark for Evaluating Psychiatric Diagnostic Capability of Large Language Models
- Prompt engineering does not universally improve Large Language Model performance across clinical decision-making tasks
- Enhancing Trustworthy Clinical Diagnosis Decision-Making in Large Language Models via Etiology-Aware Attention Supervision
- Can Large Language Models Imitate Human Speech for Clinical Assessment? LLM-Driven Data Augmentation for Cognitive Score Prediction
Source: arXiv cs.CL | 2026-10-05